Windsor v. The United States Of America

Filing 22

REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff's summary judgment Motions due by 7/15/2011 (unless the House has not identified any experts pursuant to paragraphs 5 and 6 above, in which case plaintiff's motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before June 24, 2011); Responses due by 8/15/2011; Replies due by 9/2/2011. All fact and Expert Discovery due by 7/11/2011. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/11/11). (djc)

Download PDF
05'10/2011 TUE 17:27 idl005/006 FAX 202 416 0262 BANCROFT ASSOCIATES 0 0 tTl V 0 r 0 tTl ~ n n n u tTl -J c [/) "7' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, [/) 10 Civ. 8435 (BSJ) (JCF) .. ""r1 >-< :::::; ..;;.. (1 tTl V tTl L. /" -J .-< r I tI I-~ v, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. X n :.v r ~ Plaintiff, - ~ :L " ~ "T1 r tTl 0 REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER After a conference with the parties on May 9, 2011, and consideration of the arguments of counsel, the Court hereby orders as fo]Jows: 1. Plaintiff Edith Schlain Windsor ("plaintiff"), defendant, the United States of America represented by the Department of Justice (the "DOr'), and proposed Defendant-Intervenor, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives ("the House") (collectively, "the parties"), shall exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) on or before May 13,2011; 2. Plaintiff shall serve her expert reports and provide dates for the depositions of her experts on or before May 20,2011; 3. If the House chooses, it may take the depositions of plaintiff's experts beginning on May 23,2011; 4, The parties shall exchange all 'Written requests for discovery (including document requests, interrogatories and requests for admission pursuant to Fed. R. eiv. P. 26, 33, 36) on or before June 3, 2011~ 5. The House shall identify its experts (if any) on or before June 7, 6. The House shall serve its expert reports (if any) on or before June 7. Plaintiff may take depositions of the House's experts (if any) 2011; 17,2011; beginning on June 20, 2011; 8. c 1 [/) All fact and expert discovery shall be completed by July 11, 20 f 1; '~l" "'. 05/10/2011 TUE 17:28 FAX 202 416 0262 BANCROFT ASSOCIATES 9. Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment on or before July 15, 2011 (unless the House has not identified any experts pursuant to paragraphs 5 and 6 above, in which case plaintiff's motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before June 24,2011); 10. The House shall file its opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss (if any) on or before August 15,2011 (unless the House has not identified experts pursuant to paragraphs 5 and 6 above, in which case the House shall file its opposition to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss (if any) on or before August 1,2011); 11. Plaintiff shall file a reply in support of her motion for summary judgment (including expert rebuttal declarations) (if any) and an opposition to the House's motion to dismiss (if any) and DOJ shall file a brief, if any, on or before September 2, 2011 (unless the House has not identified experts pursuant to paragraphs 5 and 6 above, in which case plaintiff shall file a reply in support of her motion for summary judgment (including expert rebuttal declarations) (if any) and an opposition to the House's motion to dismiss (if any) and DO] shall file a brief, if any, on or before August 19,2011); and 12. The House shall file its reply in support of its motion to dismiss (if any) on or before September 23, 2011 (unless the House has not identified experts pursuant to paragraphs 5 and 6 above, in which case the House shall file its reply in support of its motion to dismiss (if any) on or before September 9,2011). SO ORDERED. S C. FRANCIS IV ED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: New York, New York May 2011 Jl, 2 r.tI006/006

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?