Windsor v. The United States Of America

Filing 49

MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Document filed by The United States Of America.(Lin, Jean)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, in her capacity as Executor of the estate of THEA CLARA SPYER, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) ECF CASE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant the United States of America, through undersigned counsel, respectfully submits this Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint to request that the Court rule on Plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), 1 U.S.C. § 7. As the President and the Attorney General have stated, the Department of Justice will no longer defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA as applied to legally married same-sex couples. Pursuant to the President’s direction, however, Executive departments and agencies will continue to comply with Section 3 unless and until it is repealed by Congress or there is a definitive ruling by the Judicial Branch that Section 3 is unconstitutional. The Department of Justice represents the only defendant, the United States, in this litigation. Only a judgment against the United States could afford Plaintiff the relief she seeks, and only a judgment for or against the United States can definitively resolve the case or controversy between Plaintiff and the United States. The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (“BLAG”) of the United States House of Representatives has moved to intervene in this case for the limited purpose of defending the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA, ECF No. 12, and the Court granted that motion on June 3, 2011. ECF No. 26. We understand that on August 1, 2011, BLAG plans to move as an intervenor to dismiss Plaintiff’s constitutional challenge to Section 3. Nevertheless, as Defendant previously explained in response to BLAG’s motion to intervene, ECF No. 20, Congress’s interest in the constitutional validity of a law does not itself confer standing to enter an action as a party. The Attorney General, however, is committed to providing Congress a full and fair opportunity to participate in this litigation. The continuing role of the Executive Branch in this litigation ensures the existence of a justiciable case or controversy. In addition, the Department of Justice will take the procedural steps necessary to enable BLAG to present arguments in support of the constitutionality of Section 3. Accordingly, although pursuant to this Court’s Scheduling Order the Department intends to file a brief on August 19, 2011 that presents the government’s position on Plaintiff’s equal protection challenge, Defendant submits this motion as a procedural matter, to ensure that this Court can consider arguments on both sides of the constitutional issue and to ensure that this Court has jurisdiction to enter judgment on the basis of those arguments. If this Court agrees with BLAG on the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA, it should dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and enter judgment for Defendants. If this Court agrees with Plaintiff and the United States as to the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA, it should not dismiss the First Amended Complaint, but rather should enter such relief as is appropriate given the procedural posture of this action at the time of such determination. Dated: August 1, 2011 Respectfully submitted, TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General ARTHUR R. GOLDBERG Assistant Branch Director 2 /s/ Jean Lin JEAN LIN (NY Bar No. 4074530) Senior Trial Counsel United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20530 E-mail: Tel: (202) 514-3716 Fax: (202) 616-8470 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 1, 2011, I electronically transmitted the foregoing document to the Clerk of Court using the ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following ECF registrants: Roberta A. Kaplan Andrew J. Ehrlich Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Alexis B. Karteron Arthur N. Eisenberg New York Civil Liberties Union 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 James D. Esseks Melissa Goodman Rose A. Saxe American Civil Liberties Union Lesbian and Gay Rights Project 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004-2400 Paul D. Clement H. Christopher Bartolomucci Conor B. Dugan Bancroft PLLC 1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 470 Washington, D.C. 20006 Kerry Kircher U.S. House of Representatives 219 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?