Windsor v. The United States Of America

Filing 95

NOTICE OF APPEAL from 93 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,,,,, 94 Clerk's Judgment,,. Document filed by Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Kircher, Kerry)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________ ) EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, in her capacity as ) executor of the estate of THEA CLARA SPYER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) No. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) NOTICE OF APPEAL OF INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT THE BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives (“House”) hereby appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit the District Court’s Order (June 6, 2012) (ECF No. 93), and Judgment (June 7, 2012) (ECF No. 94), both insofar as they grant plaintiff’s [ . . . ] Motion for Summary Judgment (June 24, 2011) (ECF No. 28) and deny the [House]’s Motion to Dismiss (Aug. 1, 2011) (ECF No. 52). Copies of the Order and Judgment are attached as Exhibits A and B, respectively. The statutory basis for this appeal is 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The House is exempt from the filing fee requirement for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1913; Judicial Conference of the United States, Court of Appeals Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, available at Respectfully submitted, /s/ Paul D. Clement Paul D. Clement1 H. Christopher Bartolomucci Conor B. Dugan Nicholas J. Nelson BANCROFT PLLC 1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 470 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 234-0090 Facsimile: (202) 234-2806 Counsel for Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives2 OF COUNSEL: Kerry W. Kircher, General Counsel William Pittard, Deputy General Counsel Christine Davenport, Senior Assistant Counsel Todd B. Tatelman, Assistant Counsel Mary Beth Walker, Assistant Counsel OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 219 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Telephone: (202) 225-9700 Facsimile: (202) 226-1360 June 8, 2012 1 Kerry W. Kircher, as the ECF filer of this document, attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from signatory Paul D. Clement. 2 The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, which speaks for the House in litigation matters, is currently comprised of the Honorable John A. Boehner, Speaker of the House, the Honorable Eric Cantor, Majority Leader, the Honorable Kevin McCarthy, Majority Whip, the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Democratic Leader, and the Honorable Steny H. Hoyer, Democratic Whip. The Democratic Leader and Democratic Whip decline to support the filing of this Notice of Appeal. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on June 8, 2011, I served one copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal of Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives by CM/ECF and by electronic mail (.pdf format) on the following: Roberta A. Kaplan, Esq. Andrew J. Ehrlich, Esq. PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York City, NY 10019-6064; Alexis B. Karteron, Esq. Arthur N. Eisenberg, Esq. NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 125 Broad Street, Nineteenth Floor New York City, NY 10004; James D. Esseks, Esq, Melissa Goodman, Esq. Rose A. Saxe, Esq. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 125 Broad Street New York City, NY 10004;; Jean Lin, Esq. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CIVIL DIVISION 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Seventh Floor Washington, DC 20530 Simon Heller, Esq. STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 120 Broadway New York City, NY 10271 /s/ Kerry W. Kircher Kerry W. Kircher

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?