Cooke et al v. DB 85 Gym Corp et al

Filing 26

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein from Corey Stark dated 2/24/2012 re: Counsel for the plaintiffs request an extension of the February 29, 2012 deadline to complete fact discovery. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. The case mgmt conf of 3/16/12 is adjourned to May 11, 2012, 10:00 a.m. (Case Management Conference set for 5/11/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein.) (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 2/29/2012) (ft)

Download PDF
82/24/2012 18:53 DWECK LAW Flfi VSDCSD'.. 21269725210 DOCVM~.' ,EU:C;rR'i\!, ,\U \ filED , IlOC II: THE DWECK LAW FIRM, LlP E:-:,Il; 2j2-rJ 12 C 75 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA NEW YORK, N.Y. 10019 JACK S. DWECK" H,P. SEAN OWEOKu COREY STAAK"- TEL~PHONli: (212) 687-8200 FACSIMILE; (2121697.2521 (212 949·7477 WWW.OWECKLAW.COM IiFlfC J. SCHMEW"Z 1925·2010 * ADNllITliO"'O N.Y., CONN. ANO f"LA. ..... ADMIT'T'EO TO NX. ANa PA, $AAS Wf2STCHESiEFt OFFICE 901 NORTH BROADWAY NORTH WHITE PWNS, N,Y. 1()603 Ei.GrRS CONNEcnCU'I"OFFICe GRAVEL ISLANe ROAO New CANAAN. CT 06840 (203) 972·3000 "'". AOMrr"EO TO N,Y., ""NO N..J. I3ARS February 24, 2012 By Facsimik Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: CookelRodino v. DB 8S Gym Corp. et al. Civil Action NQ.: 11 Civ. 0201 {AKIfl (RLE) Dear Judge Hellerstein: I am a member of the Dweck Law Finn, LLP, attorneys for Plaintiffs in the above-referenced matter. I write regarding a discovery issue concerning Defendants' depositions and to request an extensi.on of the February 29, 2012 deadline to complete fact discovery. This is the first request for an extension of any discovery deadline in the Case Management Plan. Defendants' cOUllSel has deposed Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' counsel has commenced Defendants' depositions. Plaintiff has deposed Jamie Chandler, Defendants' employee, and intends to take testimony from Lamar Talbert. who is also currently employed by David Barton Gym. Based upon the fact that Mr. Talbert is a current employee, Defendants must produce him for a deposition. Despite the filct that Mr. Talbert is a current employee, he is unwilling to submit to a deposition. Defendants' attorney Michael J. Vollbrecht advised me of Mr. Talbert's reluctance to submit to a deposition, and requested that I allow him time to convince Mr. Talbert to appear voluntarily. Mr. Vollbrecht recently advised me that he is not able to convince Mr. Talbert to appear voluntarily. On this basis, we are in the process of serving Mr. Talbert with II subpoena. For strategic reasons, Plaintiffs intend to depose Mr. Talbert before the remaining witnesses. I 02i24/2012 08: 53 2125'3725210 .DWECK LAW FIR1~ THE DWECK LAW FIRM, I.I.P Hon. Alvin K. Hellcrsteln February 24,2012 Page 2 of2 In addition, discovery was delayed in this matter because of the bankruptcy proceeding involving some ofthe Defendants. Although Your Honor directed the parties to commence discovery while the bankruptcy matter was still pending, Defendants were unwilling to commence depositions until it was clear that the proceeding was nearing its conclusion. This request fur an exlension is necessitated by the bankruptcy delay, the issue involving Mr. Talbert's deposition and the parties'prior discovery dispute. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs request an extension of the fact discovel)' deadline from February 29, 2012 to April 13, 2012. Prior to making this application, I contacted Michael J. Vollbrecht, and he consented to the adjournment. J note that there is a Case Management Conference scheduled for Friday, March 16,2012. If the forgoing request is granted, we request that Your Honor adjourn the March 16th conference to a date subsequent to the proposed April 13,2012 close of met discovery. We thank Your Honor for considering the foregoing. Respectfully, THE DWECK LAW FIRj\1, LLP 0Jti9&-- Corey Stark (CS-3897) cc: Micbael J. Vollbrecht, Esq. (by electronic mail) PAGE 03/03

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?