Dunham v. City of New York et al
Filing
133
ORDER granting 132 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File (Status Conference set for 1/17/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.); granting 132 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Defendants' Letter-Motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 132) is GRANTED. The parties are directed to meet and confer and file a joint letter with the Court stating any remaining issues still in dispute by Wednesday, January 15, 2020. The In-Person Conference scheduled for Friday, January 10, 2020 is adjourned to Friday, January 17, 2020 at 10:30 am in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 132. SO-ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 1/9/20) (yv)
JAMES E. JOHNSON
Corporation Counsel
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
LAW DEPARTMENT
100 CHURCH STREET
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007
JOSEPH ZANGRILLI
phone: (212) 356-2657
fax: (212) 356-3509
jzangril@law.nyc.gov
January 8, 2020
BY ECF
Honorable Sarah L. Cave
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Re:
Jermaine Dunham v. City of New York, et al.,
11 Civ. 1223 (ALC) (SLC)
Your Honor:
I am a Senior Counsel in the New York City Law Department assigned to the
defense of the City of New York, Philip Lobello and Lamar Oliver in the above referenced
matter. In that capacity I write to respectfully request a one-week adjournment of the January 8,
2020 deadline for the parties to meet and confer and file a joint letter with the Court stating any
remaining issues still in dispute. In addition, I also write to respectfully request an adjournment
of the January 10, 2020 In-Person Conference to a date convenient to the Court following the
filing of the joint letter. Plaintiff’s counsel, Maxwell Brown, Esq., consents to these requests.
This is defendants’ first request to adjourn the filing date of the joint letter and to adjourn the Inperson conference.
At the outset, I sincerely apologize for this late request. I received plaintiff’s
updated discovery demands in the afternoon on Friday, January 3, 2020 and it was the parties’
intention to have a meet and confer early this week and file a joint letter in accordance with Your
Honor’s December 17, 2019 Order. However, I became extremely ill over the weekend and have
been home with the flu this entire week. Due to my illness, we have been unable to have our
meet and confer and thus, are unable to file a joint letter. Because the parties will not be able to
confer and file their letter, I am also requesting the Court to adjourn the In-Person conference
currently scheduled for January 10, 2020 at 2:30 p.m., until after the parties have completed their
meet and confer and filed their joint letter apprising the Court of any remaining issues in
dispute.1
1
For the convenience of the Court, the parties have determined that they are all available to
appear for an In-person conference at any time on January 16th, 17th or 24th.
It is for these foregoing reasons, defendants respectfully request the Court to
adjourn the deadline for the parties to meet and confer and file a joint letter from January 8, 2020
until January 15, 2020 and to adjourn the January 10, 2020, In-person conference to a later date
convenient with the Court.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Joseph Zangrilli
Senior Counsel
cc:
BY ECF
All counsel of record
Defendants' Letter-Motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 132) is GRANTED. The parties are
directed to meet and confer and file a joint letter with the Court stating any remaining issues
still in dispute by Wednesday, January 15, 2020. The In-Person Conference scheduled for
Friday, January 10, 2020 is adjourned to Friday, January 17, 2020 at 10:30 am in Courtroom
18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close
ECF No. 132.
SO-ORDERED 1/9/2020
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?