The California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Fuld et al

Filing 5

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-14) by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Sourthern District of New York, MDL No. 2017. (tnS,) (Filed on 2/24/2011)[Transferred from California Northern on 2/25/2011.]

The California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Fuld et al

Doc. 5

Case MOL No. 2017 Document 92 Filed 02/24/11

Page 1 of 2

JUDGE KAPW}TNITED

11 CV 1281 STATESO~UDICIAL
PANEL MDk, No:,.?O 17
C:;:J

MUL TIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., SECURITIES &EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION

. /)
~(:

-r;

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

C

r'1

C:~:j

,
"

1',)

Cl

-q
::~

.....

.

., -t!
\'q ..{ i-'
'-'

",

.:)
""",:1
,...,,,

r:

.PI>

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-14)

:-< ._
CJ1 1.0

-,-.,:",.

')

'.:J

'''-'

On February 9, 2009, the Panel transferred 9 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.c. §1407. See 598 F.Supp.2d 1362 (l.P.M.L. 2009). Since that time, 20 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Lewis A Kaplan.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and assigned to Judge Kaplan.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Liti&ation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of February 9, 2009, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Lewis A Kaplan. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time. the stay is lifted.

~Jeffery N. Luthi Clerk of the Panel ··A CERt~6px,., '=
.

FOR THE PANEL:

Feb 24, 2011
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MUlTIOISTRICT LITIGATION

(~~l~J~~~&~("
BY

:-~ .'

.

.Deputy ~lerk ;

~~

"":»
(j

.'.;'

.:

Dockets.Justia.com

Case MOL No. 2017 Document 92 Filed 02/24/11

Page 2 of 2

IN RE: LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., SECURITIES &EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION

MDL No. 2017

SCHEDULE CTO-14 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

C.A.NO.
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN
3

CASE CAPTION

11-00562

The California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Fuld et al