Safflane Holdings Ltd. et al v. Gagosian Gallery, Inc.

Filing 51

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger from Aaron Richard Golub dated 9/21/2011 re: Plaintiffs seek a modification of this Court's order dated September 21, 2011, concerning plaintiffs' September 20, 2011, letter application related to the Court ordered valuation reports. ENDORSEMENT: To clarify, the disclosures would be solely for settlement purposes. Failure to exchange such information would substantially undercut their utility in settlement discussions. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger on 9/21/2011) (djc)

Download PDF
: I\le~,ern ;ah :Jc.v,d 34 I~e,>;' . ' I C1t'go I~b@01"'go Il'b.con"1 Gianc, J;~Cjui're ngionc@ot'golub.com b5::jui're 67tfl Sh'eet. dlu@C't'goluoc0m f=loor ? Ii .838-41311 y ~..,.,k, Ne\Yl y o"r'k 10065 +=oc,;mile 21'2.636-4569 20ll VIA FAX Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger United States District Court Southern District of New York Courtroom: 17D 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 SEP 2 1 ,)[,.,11 i...l!J Re: Safflane Holdings Ltd. et aI. v. Gagosian Gallery, Inc., No. CV ll-1679-DLC and related action Dear Judge Dolinger: Plaintiffs seek a modification of this Court's order dated September 21, 2011, concerning plaintiffs' September 20, 2011, letter application related to the Court ordered valuation reports. Plaintiffs' September 20, 2011, letter application sought permission to submit the valuation reports exclusively to the Court in advance of the September 26, 2011, settlement conference ("Settlement Conference"). The valuation reports are preliminary, lengthy and detailed documents, prepared specifically for the Settlement Conference and intended for the Court's eyes only. Plaintif intended that the Court review the valuation reports advance the Settlement Conference for Court's convenience; and in the interest of saving this Court the time necessary to revie't"l the valuation reports at the Settlement Conference and to aid in helping the Settlement Conference proceed without any lengthy delays. The valuation reporcs are not final and disclosing the reports to opposing counsel would affect expert disclosure and prejudice expert discovery, which plaintiffs do not want. Under no circumstances do plaintiffs want to disclose their valuation reports and the identity of the expert who prepared the reports - - - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1\i; .";Jt.~_,'C;;-.,:"j p.e Ron. Michael H. Dolinger September 21, 2011 Page -2­ to opposing counsel. In the event plaintiffs retain the same ex:pert that prepared the valuation reports the Settlement Conference as the expert in this matter, plaintiffs would be extremely prejudiced. Inasmuch as this settlement, in no way do plaintiffs want to disclose their valuation reports. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' tfully request that this Court modify its September 21, 2011/ order and direct that valuation be deemed confidential and to be submitted only to the Court. arg/dl cc: All opposing counsel fax FAX Cover Sheet Date: September 21,2011 To: Aaron Richard Golub, Esq. Nehemiah Salomon Glanc, Esq. Aaron Richard Golub, Esquire, PC 34 East 67th Street 3rd Floor New York, NY 10065 (212)-838-4811 Fax: (212)-838-4869 Hollis Anne Bart, Esq. Brian Dunefsky, Esq. Dara G. Hammerman, Esq. Withers Bergman, LLP 430 Park Avenue, 10th Fir. New York, NY 10022 (212) 848~9800 Fax: (212)848~9888 Re: Safflane Holdings, Ltd., v. Gagosian Gallery. Inc .. 11 Civ. 1679 (DLC) (MHD) Endorsed order: liTo clarify, the disclosures would be solely for settlement purposes. Failure to exchange such information would substantially undercut their utility in settlement discussions. JJ From: Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1670 New York, New York 10007-1312 FAX (212) 805-7928 TELEPHONE NUMBER (212) 805-0204 This document contains ~ pages, including this cover sheet.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?