Gupta v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, CONSENTED TO AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiff Rajat K. Gupta (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff,) and counsel for Defendant the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant" ) that the deadline to file Defendant's Answer be enlarged from July 25, 2011 to August 1,2011. This is the first time the parties have asked for an extension of the pleading deadlines. ( Securities and Exchange Commission answer due 8/1/2011 ) (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 7/26/11) (laq)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK '.-----------------------------------x RAJATK. GUPTA, Plaintiff, No. ll-CV-1900 (JSR) v. Stipulatiog and Order to Extend Time to Answer SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Defendant. ---------··---·-----_·_-_·_----_·_--x IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, CONSENTED TO AND AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiff Rajat K. Gupta (hereinafter refetred to as "Plaintiff,) and counsel for Defendant the United States Securities . and Exchange Commission (hereinafter referred to as . "Defendant'') that the deadline to file Defendant's Answer be enlarged from July 25, 2011 to 1QJ2Il7111l.1 August 1,2011. This is t'he'first time tbeparties have asked for an extension of the pleading deadlines. Dated: New York, New York July 22. 2011 KRAMER LEVIN NAP!ALIS & FRANKEL LLP UNITED STATES SECURITIES & ?7E?O? SSN iN ~::2~ M:: . BY:~ --~ru~·c~ruu~d~M7.~H~u?m'~~-c---- . Gary P. Naftilis S. Obennan Alan R. Friedman David S. Frankel Christopher Bruckmann 100 F. Street. N.B. Washington, D.C. 20549 (202) 551-5140 Robin M. Wilcox 1171 Avenue ofthe Americas New York. New York 10036 (212) 715-9100 Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff IT IS sO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York 7 is(O( I ,2011 I H~~~ .~'''''' ., I. -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?