Tejada v. Ottomanelli's Cafe Franchising Corp. et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND. IT IS HEREBY stipulated and agreed by the attorneys for the respective parties herein, that the time for the Defendants to answer or otherwise move with respect to the Complaintbe and the same is hereby extended to and including June 24, 2011. All Defendants answer due 7/24/11. (Motions due by 6/24/2011.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 6/10/11) (rjm)
·
- - ".
.
C'
luu~~rmru
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW VORl<
WILLIAM TEJADA and EDUARDO ROSA, Individually and on
Beh?lf of All Other Past and Present Similarly Situated
Employees,
Plain ti ffs,
CASE NUMBER:
11 CV 2112
onOMANElU'S CAFE FRANCHISING CORP. djbj:a
onOMANElLi BROTHERS N¥ GRILL, NICOLO onOMANELLI
STiPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND
and JOSEPH OnOMANElLI,
De.fen dants.
IT IS HEREBY stipulated and agreed by the. al~orr\eys for the respective parties herein,
that the time for the Defendants to answer or otherwise move with respect to the Complaint
be and the same is
b'y' extended to and including June. 24, 2011.
William Ca
Law Office of WI.. me faro
19 West 44th Street, ulte 1500
New York, New York 10036
212-583-7400
Counsel for Plaintiffs
Dated:
ulsi tl
Allen Breslow (:£I.B1884)
law Offi~e of Allen B. Breslow
6165 jericho Turnpike
Commack, New York 11725
631·SI.l3-1l91
Counsel for D.efendant5
Dated: <.-!8\11
____""'!2:~or
I..,eA h
¢,-\'''' ~
,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?