Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al
Filing
168
ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Avoine-Servico de Consultadoria e Marketing LDA.(Rodes, Leonard)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
v.
:
:
POKERSTARS, et al.,
:
:
Defendants;
:
:
ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN :
THE ASSETS OF POKERSTARS, et al., :
:
Defendants-in-rem. :
-----------------------------------------------------x
11 Civ. 2564 (LBS)
CLAIMANT AVOINE - SERVICO DE
CONSULTADORIA E MARKETING, LDA’S
VERIFIED ANSWER TO THE
VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Claimant, Avoine – Service de Consultadoria e Marketing, LDA (“Avoine”), by and
through its undersigned attorneys, Trachtenberg Rodes & Friedberg LLP, as and for its answer to
the Verified First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to its restricted appearance in this
matter:
1.
Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or
falsity of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 10 of the Complaint.
2.
Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or
falsity of the allegations set forth in paragraph 11 of the Complaint, except denies that the
property in which Avoine claims an interest (“Avoine’s Property Interest”) is subject to
forfeiture.
3.
Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or
falsity of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 12 through 16 of the Complaint.
4.
Denies that any response to paragraphs 17 through 20 of the Complaint is
required insofar as those paragraphs set forth conclusions of law, and otherwise denies
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?