Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al

Filing 168

ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Avoine-Servico de Consultadoria e Marketing LDA.(Rodes, Leonard)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : v. : : POKERSTARS, et al., : : Defendants; : : ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN : THE ASSETS OF POKERSTARS, et al., : : Defendants-in-rem. : -----------------------------------------------------x 11 Civ. 2564 (LBS) CLAIMANT AVOINE - SERVICO DE CONSULTADORIA E MARKETING, LDA’S VERIFIED ANSWER TO THE VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Claimant, Avoine – Service de Consultadoria e Marketing, LDA (“Avoine”), by and through its undersigned attorneys, Trachtenberg Rodes & Friedberg LLP, as and for its answer to the Verified First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to its restricted appearance in this matter: 1. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 10 of the Complaint. 2. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations set forth in paragraph 11 of the Complaint, except denies that the property in which Avoine claims an interest (“Avoine’s Property Interest”) is subject to forfeiture. 3. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 12 through 16 of the Complaint. 4. Denies that any response to paragraphs 17 through 20 of the Complaint is required insofar as those paragraphs set forth conclusions of law, and otherwise denies 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?