Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al

Filing 171

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Pokerstars shall have until 5/14/2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 3/20/2012) (ab)

Download PDF
..... _..__ ....._... I . ." : lJ2>U.'l ::,; '.,,! 1 I,,", \ 'I'C')'·' l ~J.i~l>.-' I ,,'/ \_-~ 1;<, JIFNT .'-- . ". .. ==::=.:::~-~.- 'J \ ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED S~ATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , DOC #: __---:.,.-~--=- II DATE F~LED: 3:·02 a·- \~ -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, P 'I STIPULATION AND ORDER ntiff, - v. 11 C . :2564 (LBS) POKERSTARS, et al., Defendants; ALL RIG~T, TITLE AND INTEREST IN THE ASSETS OF POKERS TARS , et al" Defendants in-rem. x WHEREAS, on or about April 14, 2011, corr,plaint, ~L~ Civ. 2~64 (L3S) (the "Compla a verified til) was filed under seal in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking the forfeiture of certain properties (the "Subject Property") pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1955 (d), 981 (a) (1) (A), seeking civil money launde Uni and 981 (a) (1) (C), and ng penalties pursuant to Title 18, tates Code, Section 1956 against, Oldford inter alia, Ltd., Rational Entertainment En~erprises PokerSLars, Ltd., Pyr Software Ltd., Stelekram Ltd., and Sphene International Ltd. (collectively, "PokerStars Companies"); WHEREAS, on or about May 27, 2011, the United States provided notice of the filing of the Complaint t Companies by and through their counSG_, Skadden, Davia M. , Slate, Meagher & Flam LLP; the PokerStars ~ornow, Esq. o[ WHE~EAS, Companies PokerStars on or about July 5, 2011, waiv(::d s8rvice of (.he Complaint and Summons; WHE~EAS, on or about September 21, 2011, a verified (the "Arne:1ded CompJaint") was amended cornp:aint in this act filed seeking the forfeiture of the Subject Property and seeking rsuant to Title 18, United civil money "aundering penalties States Code, Section 1956 against the PokerStars Companies; WHEREAS, on or about October 3~, 2011, the PokerStars Companies filed a verified claim for certain of the Subject Property; WHEREAS, the PokerStars Companies have until March 19, 2012, to ar,swer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, the PokerStars Companies are in settlement discussions with the Unjted States and have requested additional time to answer or otherwise respond to t:-le Amended Complaint; NOW, THEREFORE, and between the Uni IT S HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED States of America, by its attorney Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jason H. Cowley, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, and the PokerStars Companies, by their attorney, M. Zcrnow, Esq., of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom David L~P, tha:. : I Pyr Software Ltd. waived service of the Complaint and Summons on JtL~Y 4, 2011. 2 1. The PokerStars Companies shall have until May 14, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. 2. This Order is without prejudice to any rights, remedies, claims, or defenses of any of the parties hereto. 3 3 The signature pages of this Stipulation and Order may be executed in one or more counterparts, be deemed an one of whi.ch will riginal but all of which together will constitute the same instrument. Signature pages may be by fax and such signatures shall be deemed as valid ori nals. AGREED AND CONSENTED TO: York By: 7,./10 '­ -DATE New tates Attorney . ,::"ndrew's PJ aza rk, New York 10007 (212) ---- 63 -2193 POKERSTARS, OLDFORD GROUP LTD., RATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRI SES LTD., PYR SOFT1rJARE LTD., STELEKR?]\1 LTD., and SPHENE :NTERNATIONAL LTD. By:~~~~~:b~k_l2.~_ _ David M. Zornow, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Four Times Square New York, New York 10036 (212) 735-2890 Counsel for PokerStars, Oldford Group Ltd., Rational Entertainment Enterprises Ltd., Pyr Software Ltd., Stelekram Ltd., and Sphene International Ltd. SO OH~)E D:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?