Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al
Filing
245
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Leonard B. Sand from Sharon Cohen Levin dated 8/01/2012 re: Upon the request of counsel for Avoine-Servicio De Consultadoria E Marketing, LDA ("A voine"), who has requested additional time to respond to the Government's motion for, inter alia, the interlocutory sale of all assets of several Absolute Poker-affiliated entities (D.E. 237), the Government respectfully requests that the following briefing schedule be set regarding that motion. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED., ( Responses due by 8/24/2012, Replies due by 9/7/2012.) (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 8/06/2012) (ama)
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District o/New York
The Silvio 1. A1ollo Building
One SainI Andrew's Pla=a
New York, New York 10007
August 1,2012
BY HAND
Honorable Leonard B. Sand
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street, Room 1650
New York, NY 10007
Re:
United States v, Pokerstars, et al.,
11 Civ. 2564 (LBS)
Dear Judge Sand:
Upon the request of counsel for Avoine - Servicio De Consultadoria E Marketing, LDA
("Avoine"), who has requested additional time to respond to the Government's motion for, inter alia,
the interlocutory sale of all assets of several Absolute Poker-affiliated entities (D.E. 237), the
Government respectfully requests that the following briefing schedule be set regarding that motion:
1.
A voine shall have until August 24, 2012 to respond to this motion.
2.
The Government shall have until September 7, 2012 to file a reply relating to
this motion.
Respectfully submitted,
PREET BHARARA
United States Attorney for the
Sout rn District of ew York
By:
n Cohen Levin
ichael D. Lockard
JasQ;i H. Cowley
Assistant United States Attorney
(212) 637-1060/2193/2479
\
J
cc: counsel for Avoine (by email)
The 'H~morable Leonard B. Sand
United States District Judge
i!0
v
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?