Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al
Filing
271
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Leonard B. Sand from Jason H. Cowle dated 9/21/2012 re: The Government respectfully writes in regard to its reply memorandum of law in further support of its motion for (l) the entry of the proposed stipulated order of settlement and (2) for an interlocutory sale of all assets of the Absolute Poker Settlement Group. The Government respectfully requests that it be permitted to file a reply brief of 15 pages in length. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 9/21/2012) (pl)
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District ofNew York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saml Andrew's Pla:;a
New York. New York 10007
BY HAND
Honorable Leonard B. Sand
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street, Room 1650
New York, NY 10007
Re:
United States v. Pokerstars, et aI.,
11 Civ. 2564 (LBS)
Dear Judge Sand:
The Government respectfully writes in regard to its reply memorandum of
law in further support of its motion for (l) the entry of the proposed stipulated order of settlement
between the Government and the Absolute Poker Settlement Group (as defined in the Government's
memorandum in support of its motion), and (2) an order for an interlocutory sale of all assets of the
Absolute Poker Settlement Group. The Government respectfully requests that it be permitted to file
a reply brief of 15 pages in length.
n
!l
J
(' )
o
w
en.
£r=
8
z
w
o
2
~
USDSSDNY
I
DOCUMENT
1
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 1
'[DOC#:
DATE FILED:
..
,1
I
1LU;t~
!i
The Government has advised counsel for Avoine - Servico De Consultadoria E Marketing,
LDA ("Avoine") of this request, and Avoine does not oppose this request.
Respectfully submitted,
PREET BHARARA
By:
I. Cowley
Assistant United States Attorney
(212) 637-1060/2193/2479
cc: counsel for Avoine (by email)
The Honorable Leonard B. Sand
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?