Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al
Filing
287
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Leonard B. Sand from Jason H. Cowley dated 11/9/2012 re: The Government writes on its own behalf and on behalf of claimant Commonwealth of Kentucky, ex rel., J. Michael Brown, Secretary Justice and Public Safety Cabinet ("Kentucky") regarding the answer and counter claim that Kentucky filed on October 19, 2012. Kentucky, with the consent of the Government, requests that Kentucky's counter-claim, filed October 19, 2012, be dismissed without prejudice, and that such dismissal be without prejudice in particular to any rights or remedies available to Kentucky under 28 U.S.C § 2465(b). ENDORSEMENT: Granted. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 11/20/2012) (lmb)
U .S. Department.r¢:2tt=:e:::=============~
USDSSDNY
United States At 1fJOCUMENT
Southern Distric
<5NICALLY FILED
f!E
The Silvio 1. Mollo Bui!
November 9,2012
BY HAND
Honorable Leonard B. Sand
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street, Room 1650
New York, NY 10007
Re:
United States v. Pokerstars, et al.,
11 Civ. 2564-ELgg). (K'M W)
Dear Judge Sand:
The Government writes on its own behalf and on behalf of claimant Commonwealth of
Kentucky, ex reI., J. Michael Brown, Secretary Justice and Public Safety Cabinet ("Kentucky")
regarding the answer and counter claim that Kentucky filed on October 19,2012.
GAANf~D
Kentucky, with the consent ofthe Government, requests that Kentucky's counter-claim, filed3
October 19,2012, be dismissed without prejudice, and that such dismissal be without prejudice in
particular to any rights or remedies available to Kentucky under 28 U.S.c. § 2465(b).
Respectfully submitted,
PREET BHARARA
By:
Jaso
. Cowley
Assistant United States Attorney
(212) 637-1060/2193/2479
cc: (by email)
D. Eric Lycan, counsel for Kentucky
IV..(.O/J~
SO ORDERED:
The Honorable f;l8tUtd Ii, ~&mt
United States District Judge
KIM BA M. Woo)
2
nil
)\fJ
I
W
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?