Hooks et al v. Forman, Holt, Elaides & Ravin, LLC et al

Filing 76

OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 66], insofar as it finds (1) the Notice constituted an attempt to collect debt within the meaning of the FDCPA and (2) Defendant is a debt collector as defined by the Act. However, the Court finds that Plaintiffs are not entitled to "additional" damages. Accordingly, Defendant's corresponding motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 59] is DENIED. The Cl erk of Court shall terminate those motions [dkt. nos. 59, 66], and mark any pending motions denied as moot. Counsel shall confer and inform the Court by letter no later than September 21, 2015 how they propose to proceed. re: 66 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment Of Plaintiffs filed by Geraldine Moore, Karen Hooks, 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Forman, Holt, Elaides & Ravin, LLC. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/14/2015) (rjm)