Lebewohl et al v. Heart Attack Grill LLC et al
Filing
42
ORDER: The Court has received plaintiffs' 1/3/2012 letter alleging that defendant HAG LLC has failed to provide adequate responses to plaintiffs' interrogatories (attached). In particular, plaintiffs continue to seek, pursuant to the Court's 12/20/2011 Order (Dkt. No. 39), the identities of the owners and managers of Diet Center LLC (Delaware). The parties discussed this dispute at a conference before the Court today. The Court's December 20 Order declined to enforce interrogatories calling for the identification of HAG investors, but did compel disclosure of the identities of HAG owners andmanagers. Thus, if an owner or manager is also an investor, their identity as an owner or manager cannot be hidden under the cloak of investor status; their identity with respect to their position as owner or manager must be disclosed. Accordingly, HAG is hereby directed to respond in good faith to plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories, within one week of this order, and to produce all requested identities of HAG owners and manager. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/4/2012) (ft)
USDCSD~\
DOCl:\IE\1
fL[CTRO~IC\I!'
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
II! 1-1l
DOC#:
DATE FILED:
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------){
JEREMY LEBEWOHL et aI.,
Plaintiff,
11 Civ. 3153 (PAE)
-v-
ORDER
HEART ATTACK GRILL, LLC et aI.,
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ )(
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
The Court has received plaintiffs' January 3, 2012 letter alleging that defendant HAG
LLC has failed to provide adequate responses to plaintiffs' interrogatories (attached). In
particular, plaintiffs continue to seek, pursuant to the Court's December 20,2011 Order (Dkt.
No. 39), the identities of the owners and managers of Diet Center LLC (Delaware). The parties
discussed this dispute at a conference before the Court today.
The Court's December 20 Order declined to enforce interrogatories calling for the
identification of HAG investors, but did compel disclosure of the identities of HAG owners and
managers. Thus, if an owner or manager is also an investor, their identity as an owner or
manager cannot be hidden under the cloak of investor status; their identity with respect to their
position as owner or manager must be disclosed. Accordingly, HAG is hereby directed to
respond in good faith to plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories, within one week of this order,
and to produce all requested identities of HAG owners and manager.
SO ORDERED.
p~o1~l~.fr&r
United States District Judge
Dated: January 4,2012
New York, New York
JAKUBOWITZ & CHUANG LLP
ArrORNEYS AT LAW
401 BROADWAV, SUITE 408
NEW YORK, NY
10013
WILLIAM W. CHUANG
TOVIA JAKUBOWITZ
(347) 542-8529
(347) 370-9585
W/LLlAM@ICLA WLLP.COM
TOVlA@ICLAWLLP.COM
January 3, 2012
BY HAND
CONTAINS HAG AEO CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Hon. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer
U.S. District Judge
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007-1312
RE:
Lebewohl et al. v. Heart Attack GriJI LLC, et al., Case No. ll-cv-3153.
Dear Judge Engelmayer:
My firm represents the Plaintiffs in this case. I write to seek enforcement of the Court's
December 20th Order compelling Defendants HAG to provide good faith responses to
Plaintiffs' Second Set Of Interrogatories. In particular, the Plaintiffs seek the identities of
the owners and managers of Diet Center LLC (Delaware).
Despite the Court Order, HAG's Supplemental Responses to Plaintiffs' Interrogatory No.9
do not identify the owners and managers of Diet Center LLC (Delaware).l HAG claims that
the Court Order barred the disclosure of the identities of investors and owners when in fact
it only forbids the disclosure of "the identification of (or communication among) HAG
investors," HAG also argues that the members are all passive investors notwithstanding the
"legal words" in the Limited Liability Company Agreement Of Diet Center, LLC (hereinafter,
the "LLC Agreement") because Jon Basso has assured counsel that he controls all
operations of the company.
Simply put, the Plaintiffs should not have to take Mr. Basso's word as gospel to the
exclusion of all other sources of discovery. The Diet Center LLC (Delaware) operates the
Plaintiffs' Interrogatory No.9 reads: "Identify all officers. directors, owners. managers, and employees of (1)
Diet Center LLC (Texas) and (2) Diet Center LLC (Delaware)."
1
1
only Heart Attack Grill in the country. The Plaintiffs seek discovery from the owners and
managers of this entity, who would presumably know about any plans to expand to New
York, the damage, if any, caused by the Plaintiffs' use of the Illnstant Heart Attack
Sandwich" and "Triple Bypass Sandwich" marks, and other issues relating to the HAG
Marks.
The need for discovery from other owners and managers is particular severe in light of the
incomplete and contradictory discovery responses provided by Jon Basso. For instance, Mr.
Basso failed to disclose the existence of the Diet Center LLC (Texas) and Diet Center LLC
(Delaware) until late October 2011. Moreover, in an attempt to prevent Plaintiffs from
deposing Fred Mossier, HAG claimed he was "not a manager nor a person who is running
the GRILL" and that he was just an "investor-director." HAG later claimed on January 2,
2012 that Mr. MossIer is not a "manager nor a director" but rather an "investor
representative."
Also, as HAG acknowledges, its responses contradict the documentary evidence it belatedly
provided. HAG's Supplemental Responses identify Jon Basso as the managing member and
President, and state that there are no other officers or directors. The Supplemental
Responses also state that Mr. Basso is the only manager, and that Tracy Chamberlin is
sometimes the manager on the floor. This contradicts the LLC Agreement, which states that
the company "shall be managed, controlled and operated exclusively by the Members ..."
(HAG-002311.) Any Member has the authority to sign "any contract, agreement, deed,
lease, note or other document or instrument" on behalf of the Company. (HAG-002311.)
Furthermore, the LLC Agreement does not provide for a managing member. The LLC
Agreement defines "Required Members," whose determination "to take any action or make
any decision shall control." (Id.) "The Members shall take action only by a positive vote of
the Required Members." (HAG-002309.) It is clear that Mr. Basso cannot be a Required
Member. A Required Member is defined as "members having at least a majority of the
aggregate Percentage Interests held by Members as such time." (HAG-002321.) Mr.
Basso's "Percentage Interest shall be zero until each other Member has received
Distributions from the Company that equal or exceed such Member's Initial Capital
Commitment." (Id.)
In conclusion, the Plaintiffs respectfully requests that the Court clarify its December 20th
Order and compel HAG to identify all members ofthe Diet Center LLC (Delaware) and
identify the Required Members. To be clear, Plaintiffs do not seek the disclosure of the
capital commitment, percentage interest of any member in the company.
2
Very Truly Yours,
)J~iJJ,
William W. Chuang, Esq.
Enclosures (3)
CC:
Robert C. Kain, Jr. (bye-mail)
Darren Spielman (bye-mail)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?