Unilever Supply Chain, Inc. v. Koolpets Products, Inc. et al

Filing 9

STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Koolpets Products, Inc. answer due 8/8/2011; Dany K. Kouri answer due 8/8/2011; Francois Marois answer due 8/8/2011. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 7/5/11) (cd)

Download PDF
~ -- USDC SONY ~<J( DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: II DATE FILED:=-r- ~i;-) t l ~ ~ UNITED STATES DJSTlUCT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. -------.. .- ----------..- -·-x uNIi..EVER SUPPLY CHAIN. INC. Case No. 11 CV 3241 (NRB) Plaintiff. STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TOCOMPLt\INT • againstKOOLPETS PRODUCTS. INC. aIkIa PRODUITS KOOLPETS. INC.• FRANCOIS MAROIS, ct al. Defendants. ------·--------------------X IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned oounsel for Plaintiff and Defendants. that Defendants' time to answer or otberwise respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including August 8, 2011. The deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint for all Defendants is currently July 8. 2011. The original deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint for Defendant Koolpets Products, Inc. aIkIaProduits Koolpets,lnc. was June 7, 2011 and for Defendants Francois Marois and Deny K. Kouri it was June 8. 2011. This Is the second request for an extension. The first request for an extension was granted on June 6, 2011. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation .may be executed in counterparts with email, PDF or facsimile signatures treated as originals. Dated: New York, New York July 1,2011 DUANE MORRIS LLP BY~~# Gregory P. GuIia Mitchell A. Frank Vanessa C. Hew 1540 Broadway New York, New York 10036-4086 6USO'I-!.1 4 C:: B. wrence F. Carnevale Rose Auslander 2 Wall Street New York, New York 10005 Attomeyl/or the Defendants Attorneys/or PI intijJ U.S.D.J. CARTERLEDYARD& r LLP ~ ~w "t.:....95/

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?