Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al

Filing 49

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 38 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT. ENDORSEMENT: The motion to file a Supplemental Complaint is granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 1/31/2012) (rdz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ~NJ;.~~m:====::::;::.;;;~, ~. I'~ NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE ) , ~"'i" ~. ."" J COUNCIL, INC.; CENTER FOR SCIENCE ) ~ ~ IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST; FOOD ) , ,. l, ."'" " 1 :A. _ \i. ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST; PUBLIC) CITIZEN, INC.; and UNION OF ) CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, INC., ) Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRA TION; MARGARET HAMBURG, in her official capacity as Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration; CENTER FOR VETERINARY MEDICINE; BERNADETTE DUNHAM, in her official capacity as Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) I :~ g~,A,.ยท .1=.",-- "_~,"I'o, ~r,'rll1'1 ./Lj I" ; I 11 CIV 3562 (THK) ECF Case ' ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT Pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, PlFtintiffs Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Science in the Public Interest, Food Animal Concerns Trust, Public Citizen, and Union of Concerned Scientists hereby move for leave to file the Supplemental Complaint attached to this Motion. Plaintiffs respectfully propose the following schedule for briefing the merits of the new claim set forth in the Supplemental Complaint: (1) Plaintiffs would file a supplemental motion for summary judgment on February 13,2012; v, '<J

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?