Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al

Filing 82

ORDER: Having been advised that Defendants intend to oppose Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike, (Dkt. No. 79, dated April 18, 2012), and that Defendants have until May 7, 2012 to respond, the Court presently withdraws its Order, (Dkt. No. 81, dated May 2, 2012), granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 5/2/2012) (jfe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -- --------- -- --- -- x NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. et al., 11 Civ. 3562 (THK) Plaintiff, o -against- ER UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendant. - ---------- ------ ------------- -- --X THEODORE H. KATZ, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Having been advised that Defendants intend to oppose Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike, (Dkt. No. 79, dat d April 18, 2012), and that Defendants have until May 7, 20 2 to respond, the Court presently withdraws its Order, (Dkt. No.1, dated May 2, 2012), granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike. SO ORDERED. THEODORE H. UNITED STATE Dated: May 2, 2012 New York, New York JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?