Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al
Filing
12
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON WRITTEN MOTION granting 11 Motion for Christopher H. LaRosa to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for Securities Investor Protection Corporation. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 6/16/2011) (ab)
us.rJc i'i!i)N"¥
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
OOCU:\*ENT
I [ZlJM::r?~a~:1~Y m..ID
i
It
-------------------------------------------------------._-----:
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION
CORPORATION,
t D,1;:,1: fl1-L-:"'ft"""'1-)}:-'-""""'~"""""";"'-A
I
.
Plaintiff...A pp licant,
Adv. Pro. No. 08 . . 01789 (BRL)
SIP A LIQUIDATION
(Substantively Consolidated)
v.
BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT
SECCRITIES LLC,
Defendant.
In re:
BERNARD L. MADOFF,
Debtor.
IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation
of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC,
Adv. Pro. No. 10-05287 (BRL)
Case No.1: ll"'cv.. 3605 (JSR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC
VICE ON WRITTEN MOTION
v.
SACL B. KATZ, et aI.,
Defendants.
Upon the motion of Kevin H. Bell, attorney for the Securities Investor Protection
Corporation ("SIPC"), and said sponsor attorney's declaration in support;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Christopher H. LaRosa
Associate General Counsel
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
805 15 th Street, N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 371-8300
Facsimile: (202) 371 . . 6728
E-mail: clarosafa)sipc.org
1
is admitted to practice pro hac vice for SIPC in the above-captioned case in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court
are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing the discipline of
attorneys. If this action is assigned to the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system, counsel shall
immediately apply for an ECF password at nysd.uscourts.gov.
Counsel shall forward the pro hac vice fee to the Clerk of Court.
Dated: June~, 2011
New York, New York
UN
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?