Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 12

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON WRITTEN MOTION granting 11 Motion for Christopher H. LaRosa to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for Securities Investor Protection Corporation. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 6/16/2011) (ab)

Download PDF
us.rJc i'i!i)N"¥ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OOCU:\*ENT I [ZlJM::r?~a~:1~Y m..ID i It -------------------------------------------------------._-----: SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, t D,1;:,1: fl1-L-:"'ft"""'1-)}:-'-""""'~"""""";"'-A I . Plaintiff...A pp licant, Adv. Pro. No. 08 . . 01789 (BRL) SIP A LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECCRITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: BERNARD L. MADOFF, Debtor. IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 10-05287 (BRL) Case No.1: ll"'cv.. 3605 (JSR) Plaintiff, ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON WRITTEN MOTION v. SACL B. KATZ, et aI., Defendants. Upon the motion of Kevin H. Bell, attorney for the Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC"), and said sponsor attorney's declaration in support; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Christopher H. LaRosa Associate General Counsel Securities Investor Protection Corporation 805 15 th Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 371-8300 Facsimile: (202) 371 . . 6728 E-mail: clarosafa)sipc.org 1 is admitted to practice pro hac vice for SIPC in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing the discipline of attorneys. If this action is assigned to the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system, counsel shall immediately apply for an ECF password at nysd.uscourts.gov. Counsel shall forward the pro hac vice fee to the Clerk of Court. Dated: June~, 2011 New York, New York UN 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?