Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 190

Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Fernando A. Bohorquez dated 5/4/2012 re: counsel writes to confirm the plaintiff's request, with the consent of the defendants. for a postponement of the hearing scheduled for May 15. 2012, at 4:00 p.m.. for the Court to consider approval of the settlement of the above-referenced litigation, and the related scheduling dates. (pl)

Download PDF
Baker Hostetler Baker &Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaz~. r;Jew York. NY 10111 May 4, 201t./· . Ptth~1r(E 0-" VIA FACSIMILE (212) 805-7935 ~ T 212589.4200 F 212589.4201 w\Nw.bakerlaw.corr: Fernando A. 8ohorquel direct dial: 212 569 4242 FBohorquez@bakerlaw.com The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, U.S.D.J. United States District Court, Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1340 New York:, NY 10007 Attention. Mr. Caleb Deats, Law Clerk Re: Picard v. Saul B. Katz, et a/., 11 Civ. 03605 (JSR)(HBP) Dear Judge Rakoff: We write to confirm the plaintiff's request, with the consent of the defendants. for a postponement of the hearing scheduled for May 15. 2012, at 4:00 p.m .. for the Court to consider approval of the settlement of the above-referenced litigation, and the related scheduling dates. During a telephone conference on May 3, 2012, with Mr. Deats and counsel for the defendants, we were informed that the Court granted the request and rescheduled the hearing date to May 31,2012, at 4:00 p.m., fixed May 24, as the date for any objections to be filed and served, and May 29 as the date on which any reply may be filed and served The Court also requested that we provide the reason for the requested postponement. The reason for the postponement is to ensure that notice has been properly given in accordance with the applicable Bankruptcy Rules. On April 13, 2012, the plaintiff filed with this Court hiS settlement motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) and Rules 2002(a}(3} and 9019(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure ("Bankruptcy Rule"). On that date, the plaintiff also properly served the motion papers and filed in this action affidavits of service with the Clerk of this Court. See ECF Nos. 184·1. 185-4. 186-1 and 187-1. Bankruptcy Rule 9019(a) requires notice in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 2002 which requires at least 21 days' advance notice of the hearing on approval of a compromise or settlement of a controversy to all creditors. Here, to provide the requisite notice to all creditors, Bankruptcy Rule 2002 and the Bankruptcy Court's December 5, 2011 "Order Establishing Notice Procedures and Limiting Notice" ("Bankruptcy Order Limiting Notice") [Bankr. Doc. No, 4560] required a notice of the hearing to be filed in the main SIPA proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court. Oenver Chic.ago C,ncmn~'3r. CI'!.'velan,'j Coli)mb!)S CO:3[.9 Mr::sa HOI,JSlon LOS Angeles New \fiX/( Orlando \iVashll1gton. DC The Honorable Jed S, Rakoff, U.S.D.J. May 4,2012 Page 2 Inadvertently, however. the notice of hearing was filed and docketed only in Adv. Pro. No, 10-05287(BRL}. and not in the main SIPA proceeding. which is Adv, Pro. No. 08­ 01789(BRL), Because the notice of hearing was not filed and docketed in the main SIPA proceeding. the master service list did not receive notice in accordance with Bankruptcy Rules 2002(a)(3} and 9019(a) and the Bankruptcy Order Limiting Notice. We requested the postponement to provide all those on the master service list in the main SI PA proceeding with a copy of the "Notice of Rescheduled Hearing." a copy of which is attached. We also will serve notice of the rescheduled hearing date and related dates to al! interested parties in this action and file affidavits of service in the Bankruptcy Court and this Court before the rescheduled hearing date, We regret any inconvenience to the Court and the parties, Respectfully. c:;:;;.~rquez Enclosures cc: Robert Wise, Esq., Davis. Polk & Wardwell Dana M. Seshens, Esq .. Davis. Polk & Wardwell Brian E. O'Connor. Esq , Willkie, Farr & Gallagher LLP 300244760 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10]] 1 Telephone: (:212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-420J David J. Sheehan Fernando A. Bohoxquez, Jr. Regina L. Griffin A.lrorneysfor Irving H. Picard. Trusteefor the SubSfan.fiveiy Consolidated SlPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Modoff /nveslm,cnt Securities l.LC and Bernard L. Madoff UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK • Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (BRL) In re: BERNAR D L. M:ADOFF INVESTMENT STPA LIQUIDATION SECURITIES LLC, (Substantively Consolidated) Debtor. IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 10-05287 (BRL) Plaintiff, v. SAUL B. KATZ, et ai., Defendants. NOTTCE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Jrving H. Picard ("Tru:;tee"). as trustee for the liquidation of the business of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC under the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.c. §§ 78aaa el seq., and the subSLantively consolidated estate of Bernard L. Madoff. by and through the Trustec'& undersigned counsel, has filed a motion (,,'Motion"') in the United Stale;-- District Court for the Southern District of New York (HDistrict Court"), assigned Case No. ] l-Civ.-03695, which is pending in the District Court. for entry of an Order pursuant to 11 U.S.c. § 105(a) and Ru1e~ 2002(a)(3) and 9019(a) oftl"le Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, a.pproving the Settlement Agreement entered into between the Trustee and the Defendants in the above~captioncd matter. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTTCE that in $UPpott of the Motion, the Trustee has filed in the Distric1 Court and shaU rely upon the Trustee's Motion and MemorandLlffi for Entry of Order PurSllant tn Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules 2002(2)(3) and 9019(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Approving Settlement Agreement, together with all attachments, and the suppOlting Affidavit of Irving H. Picard ("Movi.ng Paperg"). The Moving Paper~ may be viewed electronically on the Di$trict Court'~ docket at ECF Nos. 185-188 or in person at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United State') Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, first floor ("Moynihan Courthouse"). PLEASE TAKE fURTHER NOTICE that response.'" if any, to the Motion must·be filed with the District COl.1lt on or before May 24, 2012, and on that date be senrcd upon (a) Baker & Hostetler LLP, 45 RockefeUer Plaza, New York, New York 1011 L Attention: David.r. Sheehan, Esq., counsel 1.0 the Trustee. (b) Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017, Attention: Robert F. Wise, Jr.. counsel to the Defendants, and (e) the Securities Tnvestor Protection Corporation, 805 Fifteenth Street, N.W., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20005, Attention: Kevin Bell, Esq" with a courtesy copy to the chambers of The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United State'S District Judge, at tbe Moynihan Courthouse. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that any reply papers may be served and filed in (he Di:;trict Court on or before May 29, 2012. 2 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the District Coun has scheduled a hearing on the Motion at 4:00 p.m., on May 31, 2012, ("Hearing"). PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that objecting parties arc required to appear at the Hearing. and failure to appear may result in entry of an order granting the relief requested in the Motion wilhollt further notice to the objecting parties or opportunity to be heard. Dated: New York, New York l'v1ay4,2012 lsI David J. Sheehan Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York. New York ]0111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 David J. Sheehan dsheehan @bakerlaw.con} Fernando A Bohorquez, Jr. iboborquez@bakerlaw.com Regina L. Griffin rgriffi n@bakedaw.com Attorneysfor Irving H. Picard. Tmsleejor the SuhstanTively Consolidated SZPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madofj Investment Securities LLC an.d Bernard L. Madoff 300244.709

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?