Hernandez v. Bettino et al
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 18 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel. filed by Vidal Hernandez. The petitioners application for the Court to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal for failure to make the required showing at this time. The petitioner has not yet made such a showing. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/24/2011) (jfe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_____________________________________
VIDAL HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner,
- against -
11 Civ. 4235 (JGK)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER
ORSID REALTY CORP., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS.
_____________________________________
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The petitioner’s application for the Court to appoint
counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal for failure to
make the required showing at this time.
The Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit has articulated factors that should guide
the Court’s discretion to appoint counsel to represent an
indigent civil litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
See Hodge v.
Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir. 1986); Jackson v.
Moscicki, No. 99 Civ. 2427 (JGK), 2000 WL 511642, at *4
(S.D.N.Y. Apr. 27, 2000).
For the Court to order the
appointment of counsel, the petitioner must, as a threshold
matter, demonstrate that his claim has substance or a likelihood
of success on the merits.
See Hodge, 802 F.2d at 61-62.
Only
then can the Court consider the other factors appropriate to
determination of whether counsel should be appointed:
“plaintiff’s ability to obtain representation independently, and
1
his ability to handle the case without assistance in the light
of the required factual investigation
legal issues
l
1
the complexity of the
and the need for expertly conducted cross-
examination to test veracity.
877 F.2d 170
l
/I
Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co.
172 (2d Cir. 1989).
1
Inc.
1
The petitioner has not yet
made such a showing.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
New York, New York
October 24, 2011
John G. Koeltl
States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?