Gilman v. Spitzer et al

Filing 18

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge J Paul Oetken from James W Halter dated 11/18/2011 re: Proposed schedule for plaintiff's motion to dismiss counterclaims and defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings, as further set forth in this document. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. Granted. (Motion due by 11/22/2011. Response due by 12/13/2011, Reply due by 1/6/2012.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/21/2011) (cd)

Download PDF
11/18/2011 12 47 FAX 212 687 1505 LIDDLE & ROBINSON, L. L. P. 800 THIRD AVENUE MEMO ENDORSED III 002/003 LIDDLE & ROBINSON, LLP NEW YORK. N Y 10022 USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICAllY FILED DOC#:,____~~~~~~II DATEFlLED:fj 2 2D~!: NOV (clc) 687-B500 _w IIdaie,abln.an com ""RIAM M E·mall Jhaher@lIddleroblnson.com ROBINSON "UTIRlO' .JI,MES W ANDREA .JAMES A !;lATSON BL. ... INE H ETHAN A PAVID I JAMES R 80RTNICI'( SHORE ..){ SS,CA H. SAVAGE MATTHEW.J Ci~ENERT MARIA W HUBBARD MCOONAL.D WONG JE NNII'"ER ROOR.GUt:Z LlOOL.f. S"MANTHA L.. PL-E5SER MAREK CHRISTINE" MARC A PAPARELLA ..)0 5tlERRY M November 18,2011 GREENBERGER J£I'"I'"Rt:Y L DAVID M O"NIEL 5 a~e:CHe:R MICI-tAt:L E: !-tAL TER roo PAL-MIERI 5US5W£IN BY FACSIMILE The Honorable J. Paul Oetken Umted States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, l\ew York 10007 Re: WIlliam Gilman v Eliot Spitzer and Tl,gSlate Group. LLC, J 1MSg43 CTPO) Dear Judge Oetken: We r~presenl the Plaintiff in the above-referenced matter. Plaintiff intends to file a motion to dismiss the counterclaim that Defendants filed on November 1, 2011. We write to request an alteration to the hriefing schedule for that motion as well as for Defendants' motion for Judgment on the pleadings in light of Plaintiffs intended motion. Defendants consent to the requested changes. , Plaintiff proposes the following schedule for Plaintiffs motion to dismiss: • Plaintiff will file a. motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaim on or before November 22, 2011 - the date it is due pursuant to Rule 12 of the hderal Rules of Civil Procedure. • Deft-mdants will file papers in opposition to Plaintiffs motion to dismiss the counterclaim on or before December 13, 201 1 • Plaintiff will file reply papers regardinc Plaintiff's motion to dismiss on or before January 6,2012. (00458227 v I) 11118/2011 1247 FAX III 003/003 LIDDLE & ROBINSON, LLP 2126871505 LIDDLE & ROBINSON, L.L.P, The Honorable J. Paul Oetken 2 November 18,20 II Local Rule 6,1 (b) would otherwise cause Defendant's opposition and Plaintiffs reply to be due on December 6,2011 and December 13,2011 respectively, Plaintiff proposes the following schedule for Defendants' motion for Judgment on the pleadings: • Plaintiff will file papers in oppositIOn to Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings on December 13, 2011 rather than the currently scheduled date of November 23, 2011. This is the same date Defendants' opposition to Plaintiffs motion to dismiss would he due as discussed above • , \ '­ Defendants wtll file reply papers regarding Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings on January 6, 2012 rather than the currently scheduled date or December 9, 2011. ThiS is the same datt: Plamtiffs repJy pap<:rs are due regarding Plaintiffs motion to dismiss. Plaintiff reserves the right, and intends, to challenge Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings as untimely because the pleadings are not closed pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties previously requested an alteration to the bnefing schedule for Defendants' motion, at the lime contemplated as a motion to dismiss, on October 13, 2011 WhCll the mat1er was reassigned to Your Honor Plaintiff seeks additional alteration of that scheduk due to the change in the nature of Defendants' motion, the additional briefing caused by Plaintiffs intended motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaim, and the schedule of counsel for the parties. Thank you lor your consideration. cc: Lee Levine. Esq. (by facsimile) Jay Ward Brown, Esq. (by facsimile) SO ORDERED: 'r~')I"~ /{jrt-. (004~8227.vll loI-,l)J U.S.DJ.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?