Ballard v. Walker et al

Filing 54

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER for 47 Report and Recommendations: Magistrate Judge Fox's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 47) is adopted and the amended complaint is dismissed as against Conte. Plaintiff's motion to amend (Dkt. No. 52) is denied. The Clerk is requested to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 12/11/2013) (tn)

Download PDF
USDC SDNY DOCr'IE:\T ELECTRO\ICAllY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:----:-1r--f-:-;.:--­ /Jjilli 3 DATE FILED: -. - - - - - - - - - - - - -x EMERSON DAVID BALLARD III, Plaintiff, 11 Civ. 5874 - against - (LLS) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NATHAN WALKER, ULTRA MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC, CHRISTOPHER (DEEP) HENDERS, d/b/a GIFTED SOURCE MUSIC (ASCAP), and JOHN CONTE, JR., Defendants. - - - -x er entry of default judgment against dispute over the rights to musical compositions, Conte in this the action was referred to Magistrate Judge Fox to hold an inquest and report and recommend Recommendation recommended Plaintiff the proper dated amount October 18, of By Report and Judge Fox Recommendation, and s. 2013, Magistrate aintiff be awarded no damages. objected to the Report and moved for leave to file a second amended complaint to cure the defects identified by Magistrate Judge Fox. For Recommendation denied. reasons is adopted, discussed below, and plaintiff's the motion to amend is A. Magistrate against Conte Judge be Fox recommended dismis lack that plaintiff's of claims juri c over Conte, among other reasons. Conte must be general j "subj ect ction" to the J url in New York, Fed. ction of R. P. a court of 4 (k) (1) \ J , for personal jurisdiction over him. Conte is a citizen of Georgia, Am. 1. ~ s. A New York ction over a non domiciliary court may exercise J 301 if he is York CPLR § business" in New York casual but with a fair measure of permanence and continui Tauza v. - ---- .....~--------~------- satis sent in New r New is, Coal Co., ---------- "is not occasional 220 N.Y. ............ ng the requirements of CPLR by virtue of "doing § 259, 267 (1917) 302, which provi As to a cause of action of the acts enumerated in t s section, a court may exercise personal juri ction over any non-domiciliary, or s executor or administrator, who in person or through an agent: 1. transac~s any iness within state or contracts anywhere to supply or services in the state; or the commits a tort act within state, as to a cause of action defamation of character arising from act; or the for he 2. 3. commi ts a tortious act without the state causing injury to or prope within the state, as to a cause of - 2 or " or by s that: famation if he action for from the act, character of arisi regul y does or solicits business, or engages in any r persistent course of conduct, or deri ves substantial revenue from goods or consumed or services rendered, in the state, or (i) ( i i) expects or should reasonably to have consequences in the ac state and derives the substantial revenue from interstate or international commercei or 4. owns, uses or possesses situated thin ~he state. any real (emphasis added) Fox strate all comolaint ely the amended complaint's the devoid of factual and 12, Rec. Compl. business' any that the jurisdiction eads all e CPLR 301's 'doi Am. all 5, test because ions amended under In ts complaint CPLR § 302 complaint does not even mention that anyone did any because "t f is & " i songwriter," and insuffic ent to satis t that ion that Conte "does business in the State of New York as record a found ac s in New York," plead that the claims id., and t not inst Conte arise "out of the transaction of business within the State," McGowan v. N.Y.2d 268, 271 does Smith, 2 (1981) On that basis, strate - 3 ­ Fox recommended dismis ing compl aint for istics Pt (2d Cir. 1 personal ction, Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin 2010) ("[B]e judgment, juri it may a first see Si _ _ _ .. ~L_~~ 619 F.3d 207, court assure grants itself a motion that it for 213 de has personal ction over the defendant.") The Court has recommendations Motor Cars de LLC novo, v. 2005), and finds in its reviewed care and Amato, conclusions over Conte, that pIa 388 iff's ng the Fox's objections, F.Supp.2d tr:e Report and Magistrate 250, 253 see Adee (S.D.N.Y. and Recommendation is correct of personal 1 tion to dismiss Report and Recommendation is adopt jurisdiction on that basis. respect. that t B. Plaintiff moves to amend tr:e complaint Leave to Fed. req'c.lires. " leave f~t lity of R. to the Civ. P. amend his mot first to 1 (a) include amendment." Merchant, 28 F.3d 246, 251 Plaintiff freely 1 " given However, undue when delay, bad v. amend. In addition to the proposed also alleges that: 4 ­ the so faitr:, S.S. ) . compla nt allegat ons secoCld or Amer can itations omitt second amended a justice "valid reasons for Mackensworth (2d Cir. 1994) attaches amended complaint, a second time. in to the ameClded complaint 57. Defendant Conte regul does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course conduct, and derives substantial revenue from ces rende the state of New York. Defendant Conte maint ns royalty aring accounts at Broadcast Music Inc. (herein "BMI") as a [sic] both a songwriter a music publishing company for thirty songs as listed on Exhibit A hereto. [1] 58. BMI is located in New York. 59. 60. Based upon information and belief, Conte's account is maintained through BMI in New York. 61. Based upon information and belief, Defendant has worked as a professional music p and songwriter in New York for the recording artist sional known as "Cassie. 1I Based upon information and belief, Defendant Conte has negotiated sample clearance and music publishing agreements in the State of New York for the master recording and music composition "Make Her Say" as performed by Artist professional known as "Kid Cudi." 62. Based upon information and belief, 63. Defendant Conte has ty accounts in New York with various record companies. The "De in proposed Conte any other second amended complaint's 7, ion that arly does or solicits business, or engages persistent course of conduct, substantial revenue from services rendered, York," all lacks supporting factual all The musical compositions at issue, 1 sted in Exhibit A. derives in the state of New ions. "Blame It" and "Make Her 5 and All II ions are both New York, and at some time ely "wi th a support the conclusion ~~ id. that Conte 61, is 62, in continui fair measure of N.Y. at 257, ~~ accounts in New York, that Conte maintains royal II 58-60, do not New York Tauza, _ _­ 220 .. such that it can be said that he "does business" in New York under CPLR § 301. ty payments for the Al though Conte allegedly rece id. ~~i through an works at issue at a BMI account maintained in New York, 58 60, mere of rece money its collection, zation o pl the ntiff 's cl CPLR ms against Conte arise transaction dealings of with plaintiff were ?laintiff does those business plaintiff York, "out of the transaction 52 N.Y.2d at 271, as Plaintiff's 302. § New is not sufficient to plead that of business u in New York, McGowan, under in claims in arise out of Conte's ia, where ace, took and his Am. Compl. ~~ Conte's breach Second made, Conte's red all ses to ses. j the location of iff also argues that for not allege "a quasi ~n sdict ion pursuant Conte's writer share to account. CPLR at § BMI 314, rem basis 18 28. of stsJ ed upon Defendant and various other royal account.s at record companies located in New York,u Pl.'s to the id & Rec. 6, and seeks leave to att.ach those accounts, at 6 7. 6 CPLR 314 (2) § ce allows of wi thou~ process state: [W]here a _udgment is demanded that the person to be served be excluded from a vested or contingent interest in or lien upon specific real or personal property wi thin the state i or that such an interest or 1 ien in favor of ei ther party be enforced, at defined or Ii ted; or otherwise ti the title to such including an action of or defensive interpleader. However, under ction, same test " fair jurisdiction only tenable 'F l~ they \AJashi - - - -.. ~'-........- .... Here, some must in personam,u his other act De 316 (1977), evaluated al under justice as governs id. at 207. Thus, royal ty accounts ties show that Internationa~ with New York, 310, 186 lS Conte Shoe Co. v. (1945) Conte's alleged contacts with New York are that he at time receives , 326 U.S. rem, U.S. based on Conte's and "minima=- contacts" in 433 ay and substantial rem jurisdict ~n Heitner, quasi of assertions quasi v. incl juri has Shaffer worked royal in New York payments in the through music field, Broadcast and Music that Inc., he which does business in New York. se No on which plaintiff relies his action is al=-eged to have occurred in New York. receipt \\some of act royal by which payments the in New defendant York purpose cannot causes of Conte's passive be ly avails said to be itself of the 357 cat t wi of fits and protect thus invoking the v. a/ ----- ties conducting act lege U.S. 235, 253 forum State / its laws/u Hanson Jurisdiction (1958). cannot be on CPLR § 314. Accordingly, complaint is pI so plaintiff's denied does for not motion futility, to file as a plaintiff's allege adequate jurisdiction over Conte. Conclusion MagistYate Judge Fox's 47) is Conte. The and Recommendation (Dkt. No. and the amended complaint is dismissed as Plaintiff's Cleyk s motion to amend requested to enter (Dkt. judgment No. 52) ac is denied. and close this case. So ordered. Dated: New York, NY 11, 2013 _~~.Stanton sillM¥~ Louis L. U.S.D.J. - 8 ­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?