Taylor v. New York City Department of Education et al

Filing 31

OPINION re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. filed by Brenda Hollomon, 21 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by The City of New York, Nancy Velez, New York City Department of Education. Defendants' motion to dismiss is G RANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Pursuant to the Court's individual rules, after Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 19, 2012, Plaintiff was given the option of amending her complaint in response to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff a vailed herself of this opportunity and filed the Amended Complaint, leading Defendants to file motions to dismiss in early May of 2012. (D.E. 17, 19, 21, 24). Because Plaintiff was afforded an opportunity to amend her complaint to cure its defects, t he Court's dismissal ofthe DOE and City of New York is with prejudice. An Initial Pretrial Conference is set for September 21, 2012, at 4:30 pm. The parties are directed to the Court's March 5, 2012 order regarding the materials that must be submitted in advance of that conference and the deadline for doing so. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/6/2012) (jfe)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?