Flores v. Jade Doe/Melvin Hollins et al
Filing 23
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust its sole claim. Because Flores has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, appellate review is not warran ted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 241 (2d Cir. 1998). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(a)(3), the Court further finds that any appeal of this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to dismiss the petition and close the case. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/17/2014) (tn)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
