Poole v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 11

ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report in full, dismissing the petition with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. The Court certifies, pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Barbara S. Jones on 12/3/2012) (djc)

USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRON1CALLY FILeD

UNI
STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------x
DARIN POOLE,

DOC# ______~__T-~.-~~
0 '"
DATE FILED:
1:1-/ 0 )

r

I

Z?r

Plaintiff,
11 Civ. 8886
(BSJ) (FM)

v.
CITY OF NEW YORK, P.O. TAYLOR, and
P.O. TANCREDI,

Order

Defendants.

-- -- -- -- -- -------------------------x
BARBARA S. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On November 5, 2012, Magistrate Judge Maas issued a Report
and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that this Court
dismiss the complaint without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Pro se

aintiff failed to object to Judge Maas's Report within

14 days, as ordered.
The Court has reviewed the Report and is satisfied that
there is no clear error on the face of the record, and confirms
and adopts the Report in its entirety.

See King v. Greiner, No.

02 Civ. 5810(DLC), 2009 WL 2001439, at *4

(S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2009)

(citation omitted); see also wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F.
Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).

Plaintiff's failure to file

written objections precludes appellate review of this decision.
517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008).

See

Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report in full, dismissing
the petition with prejudice.
to close the case.

The Clerk of the Court is directed

fj)

The Court certi

es, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3),

that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith,

and

refore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose

of an appeal.

See

369 U. S. 438, 444­

45 (1962).
SO ORDERED:

JUDGE

Dated:

New York, New York
December 3, 2012