Capitol Records, LLC v. Redigi Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER. The Court is in receipt of a letter from counsel for non-party Google Inc. dated February 1, 2012, which seeks leave to file an amicus curiae brief "in order to highlight the importance of the copyright law questions Plaintiff's pending preliminary injunction motion raises." Because the Court believes that the parties are fully capable of raising these issues themselves- and have every incentive to do just that Google Inc.'s request is HEREBY DENIED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/1/2012) (rjm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC, USDSSDNY DOCUMENT \\ ELECTRONICALLY FILED II DOC #: . . llDATE '~~. ••._ _ L -___-:.~_ ,lxi-/) _==:Jd I I Plaintiff, No. 12 Civ. 95 (RJS) ORDER -v- REDIGI INC., Defendant. RICHARD 1. SULLIVAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter from counsel for non-party Google Inc. dated February 1, 2012, which seeks leave to file an amicus curiae brief "in order to highlight the importance of the copyright law questions Plaintiffs pending preliminary injunction motion raises." Because the Court believes that the parties are fully capable of raising these issues themselves - and have every incentive to do just that Google Inc.'s request is HEREBY DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1,2012 New York, New York ... /~-?~ -~~~~~. '"':._,.J ,,'" RIC RDJ. SULLIVAN Ul\fITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?