Capitol Records, LLC v. Redigi Inc.
Filing
24
ORDER. The Court is in receipt of a letter from counsel for non-party Google Inc. dated February 1, 2012, which seeks leave to file an amicus curiae brief "in order to highlight the importance of the copyright law questions Plaintiff's pending preliminary injunction motion raises." Because the Court believes that the parties are fully capable of raising these issues themselves- and have every incentive to do just that Google Inc.'s request is HEREBY DENIED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/1/2012) (rjm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC,
USDSSDNY
DOCUMENT
\\ ELECTRONICALLY FILED
II DOC #: .
.
llDATE
'~~. ••._ _
L -___-:.~_ ,lxi-/) _==:Jd
I
I
Plaintiff,
No. 12 Civ. 95 (RJS)
ORDER
-v-
REDIGI INC.,
Defendant.
RICHARD 1. SULLIVAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of a letter from counsel for non-party Google Inc. dated February
1, 2012, which seeks leave to file an amicus curiae brief "in order to highlight the importance of
the copyright law questions Plaintiffs pending preliminary injunction motion raises." Because
the Court believes that the parties are fully capable of raising these issues themselves - and have
every incentive to do just that
Google Inc.'s request is HEREBY DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 1,2012
New York, New York
... /~-?~
-~~~~~. '"':._,.J
,,'"
RIC
RDJ. SULLIVAN
Ul\fITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?