Capitol Records, LLC v. Redigi Inc.
Filing
274
MOTION for C. Dennis Loomis to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-13047152. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by John Ossenmacher, Redigi Inc., Larry Rudolph. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing Issued by the Supreme Court of CA, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Loomis, C. Dennis)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
x
CAPITOL RECORDS LLC, CAPITOL
CHRISTIAN MUSIC GROUP, INC. and
VIRGIN RECORDS IR HOLDINGS, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
-- against -REDIGI, INC., JOHN OSSENMACHER
and LARRY RUDOLPH a/k/a LAWRENCE
S. ROGEL
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Docket No. 12-cv-00095 (RJS)
ORDER TO ADMIT
C. DENNIS LOOMIS,
PRO HAC VICE
x
The motion of C. Dennis Loomis, for admission to practice pro hac vice in the above
captioned matter is granted.
Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the Bar of California and
that his contact information is as follows:
C. Dennis Loomis
cdloomis@bakerlaw.com
Baker & Hostetler LLP
11601 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509
Telephone: 310.880.8800
Facsimile: 310.880.8859
Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel
for Redigi, Inc., John Ossenmacher and Larry Rudolph a/k/a Lawrence S. Rogel in the above
entitled action;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that C. Dennis Loomis, is admitted to practice Pro Hac
Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court,
including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.
Dated: _____________________________
_________________________________
United States District / Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?