Capitol Records, LLC v. Redigi Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of letters from both Plaintiff and Defendant, each dated February 14, 2012, regarding the parties' proposed Case Management Plan. In its letter, Defendant suggests "establish[ing] a firm, publicly known, deadline for the filing of amicus curiae motions [in connection with the parties' summary judgment motions]" and "dispens[ing] with pre-motion conferences for those motions." Plaintiff opposes Defendant's requests. Because Defendant has not demonstrated any facts to overcome the Court's conclusion, as stated in an Order dated February 1, 2012, that the parties are fully capable of raising issues that third parties would raise in amicus curiae briefs and have every incentive to do so, Defendant's requests ARE HEREBY DENIED. The parties' proposed Case Management Plan, as modified by the Court, is set forth in a separate Order. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/14/2012) (mro)

USDSSDNY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DOCUlv1ENT

-~

ELECTF.ONICi\LLY FILED

I
I

~~~E FILED: ~ -/ S-/Z. I

CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
-v-

No. 12 Civ. 95 (RJS)

ORDER

REDIGI INC.,
Defendant.

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of letters from both Plaintitf and Defendant, each dated February
14, 2012, regarding the parties' proposed Case Management Plan.

In its letter, Defendant

suggests "establish[ing] a firm, publicly known, deadline for the filing of amicus curiae motions
[in connection with the parties' summary judgment motions]" and "dispens[ing] with pre-motion
conferences for those motions." Plaintiff opposes Defendant's requests. Because Defendant has
not demonstrated any facts to overcome the Court's conclusion, as stated in an Order dated
February 1,2012, that the parties are fully capable of raising issues that third parties would raise
in amicus curiae briefs and have every incentive to do so, Defendant's requests ARE HEREBY
DENIED. The parties' proposed Case Management Plan, as modified by the Court, is set forth
in a separate Order.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 14,2012
New York, New York

~~J2?~
R
ARD 1. SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE