Capitol Records, LLC v. Redigi Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of letters from both Plaintiff and Defendant, each dated February 14, 2012, regarding the parties' proposed Case Management Plan. In its letter, Defendant suggests "establish[ing] a firm, publicly known, deadline for the filing of amicus curiae motions [in connection with the parties' summary judgment motions]" and "dispens[ing] with pre-motion conferences for those motions." Plaintiff opposes Defendant's requests. Because Defendant has not demonstrated any facts to overcome the Court's conclusion, as stated in an Order dated February 1, 2012, that the parties are fully capable of raising issues that third parties would raise in amicus curiae briefs and have every incentive to do so, Defendant's requests ARE HEREBY DENIED. The parties' proposed Case Management Plan, as modified by the Court, is set forth in a separate Order. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 2/14/2012) (mro)

Download PDF
USDSSDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUlv1ENT -~ ELECTF.ONICi\LLY FILED I I ~~~E FILED: ~ -/ S-/Z. I CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC, Plaintiff, -v- No. 12 Civ. 95 (RJS) ORDER REDIGI INC., Defendant. RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of letters from both Plaintitf and Defendant, each dated February 14, 2012, regarding the parties' proposed Case Management Plan. In its letter, Defendant suggests "establish[ing] a firm, publicly known, deadline for the filing of amicus curiae motions [in connection with the parties' summary judgment motions]" and "dispens[ing] with pre-motion conferences for those motions." Plaintiff opposes Defendant's requests. Because Defendant has not demonstrated any facts to overcome the Court's conclusion, as stated in an Order dated February 1,2012, that the parties are fully capable of raising issues that third parties would raise in amicus curiae briefs and have every incentive to do so, Defendant's requests ARE HEREBY DENIED. The parties' proposed Case Management Plan, as modified by the Court, is set forth in a separate Order. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 14,2012 New York, New York ~~J2?~ R ARD 1. SULLIVAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?