Sherman v. Town of Chester et al

Filing 155

ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be cons ummated within ninety (90) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within ninety (90) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next ninety (90) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/14/2022) (ama)

Case 1:12-cv-00647-ER-GWG Document 155 Filed 06/14/22 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
STEVEN M. SHERMAN,
Plaintiff,
– against –
TOWN OF CHESTER, TOWN BOARD OF
THE TOWN OF CHESTER, and PLANNING
BOARD OF THE TOWN OF CHESTER,
Defendants.

ORDER
12 Civ. 647 (ER)

RAMOS, D.J.:
�e Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is
ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either
party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within ninety (90) days of
the date hereof.
Any application to reopen must be filed within ninety (90) days of this Order; any
application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are
advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing
any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the
next ninety (90) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 14, 2022
New York, New York

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.