White et al v. West Publishing Corporation et al
Filing
31
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL DEEMING MOTION MOOT AND VACATING THE APRIL 17, 2012, HEARING SESSION...Before the Panel is a motion by plaintiff David J. Heinlein, Inc., seeking centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, of the actions on the attached schedule in the District of Connecticut for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Movant now seeks to withdraw his Section 1407 motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is DEEMED WITHDRAWN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed on APRIL 17, 2012, are VACATED insofar as they relate to this matter. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/17/2012) (sjo)
Case MDL No. 2367 Document 25 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: WESTLAW AND LEXISNEXIS LEGAL
WORKS COPYRIGHT LITIGATION
David J. Heinlein v. West Publishing Corporation,
)
D. Connecticut, C.A. No. 3:12-00386
)
Edward L. White, et al. v. West Publishing Corporation, et al., )
S.D. New York, C.A. No. 1:12-01340
)
MDL No. 2367
ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN
AND VACATING THE MAY 31, 2012, HEARING SESSION ORDER
Before the Panel is a motion by plaintiff David J. Heinlein filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407.
In his motion, plaintiff seeks centralization of the above-listed actions in the United States District
Court for District of Connecticut for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. No other
party supports centralization of the above-listed actions. Movant now seeks to withdraw his Section
1407 motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407
is DEEMED WITHDRAWN.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed
on April 17, 2012, are VACATED insofar as they relate to this matter.
FOR THE PANEL:
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?