White et al v. West Publishing Corporation et al

Filing 31

CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL DEEMING MOTION MOOT AND VACATING THE APRIL 17, 2012, HEARING SESSION...Before the Panel is a motion by plaintiff David J. Heinlein, Inc., seeking centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, of the actions on the attached schedule in the District of Connecticut for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Movant now seeks to withdraw his Section 1407 motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is DEEMED WITHDRAWN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed on APRIL 17, 2012, are VACATED insofar as they relate to this matter. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/17/2012) (sjo)

Download PDF
Case MDL No. 2367 Document 25 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: WESTLAW AND LEXISNEXIS LEGAL WORKS COPYRIGHT LITIGATION David J. Heinlein v. West Publishing Corporation, ) D. Connecticut, C.A. No. 3:12-00386 ) Edward L. White, et al. v. West Publishing Corporation, et al., ) S.D. New York, C.A. No. 1:12-01340 ) MDL No. 2367 ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN AND VACATING THE MAY 31, 2012, HEARING SESSION ORDER Before the Panel is a motion by plaintiff David J. Heinlein filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. In his motion, plaintiff seeks centralization of the above-listed actions in the United States District Court for District of Connecticut for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. No other party supports centralization of the above-listed actions. Movant now seeks to withdraw his Section 1407 motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is DEEMED WITHDRAWN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed on April 17, 2012, are VACATED insofar as they relate to this matter. FOR THE PANEL: Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?