Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al
MOTION to Intervene for Purposes of Appeal. Document filed by Bob Kohn. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brower, Steven)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC.,
HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS, L.L.C.
VERLAGSGRUPPE GEORG VON
HOLTZBRINK PUBLISHERS, LLC
THE PENGUIN GROUP,
A DIVISION OF PEARSON PLC,
PENGUIN GROUP (USA), INC. and
SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC.,
Civil Action No.12-CV-2826 (DLC)
MOTION BY BOB KOHN FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE
FOR SOLE PURPOSE OF APPEAL
Movant Bob Kohn, on his own behalf and by his attorneys, and pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
§16(f)(3) and Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves for leave to
intervene in this action for the sole purpose of appeal. The grounds for this motion, as more fully
set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, are that Movant, together with millions of other ebook consumers and the public generally, will be a victim of the harmful effects of the Final
Judgment and, as such, he has a direct and immediate interest in the outcome of this case, and
that, absent his participation, appellate review of the issues raised by Movant in his public
submissions in this matter opposing the the Court’s judgment and public interest determination
will be foreclosed.
WHEREFORE, this motion should be granted and Movant should be authorized to
intervene as a party in order to appeal the Opinion & Order regarding the Final Judgment filed
on September 6, 2012. A form of proposed Order is attached.
Dated: September 7, 2012
California Bar No. 100793
140 E. 28th St.
New York, NY 10016
Tel. +1.408.602.5646; Fax. +1.831.309.7222
/s/ Steven Brower
STEVEN BROWER [PRO HAC]
California Bar No. 93568
18400 Von Karman Ave., Suite 800
Irvine, California 92612-0514
Pro Bono Counsel to Bob Kohn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?