Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al
Filing
40
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 39 Motion for Richard Parker to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ENDORSEMENT: Granted.. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 5/3/2012) (jfe)
DO'C"#,39
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 12-cv-02826 (DLC)
ECFCase
NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION
PRO HAC VICE OF RICHARD PARKER
APPLE INC., et a1.
Defendants.
~y,
l...-- J/.
"I
~~
1-7
'/of IV
1
'
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.3(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York, I, Andrew J. Frackman, Esq., a member in good standing
of the bar of this Court, hereby moves for an Order allowing the admission pro hac vice of:
Richard Parker
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
1625 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 383-5380 Direct
(202) 383-5414 Facsimile
rparker@omm.com
(r,
o
.;,
'.
to appear on behalf of defendant Apple Inc. in this action.
In support of this application, annexed hereto is the Declaration of Andrew J. Frackman,
Esq., Declaration of Richard Parker, Esq., and Certificates of Good Standing from the District of
Columbia and the State of California verifying that Mr. Parker is a member in good standing of
the bars of the District of Columbia and California. This motion is also accompanied by
payment to the Clerk of this Court of the total fee of two hundred dollars ($200.00). No brief is
necessary in support of this motion since it raises no issues of law and the relief sought is wholly
within the Court's discretion. A proposed Order is attached.
Dated: New York, New York
May 1,2012
By:+-____+-~~~----------An ew J. F ckman, Esq.
Times Squa Tower
7 Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 326-2000
Facsimile: (212) 326-2061
afrackman@omm.com
Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?