Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 40

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 39 Motion for Richard Parker to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ENDORSEMENT: Granted.. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 5/3/2012) (jfe)

Download PDF
DO'C"#,39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 12-cv-02826 (DLC) ECFCase NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF RICHARD PARKER APPLE INC., et a1. Defendants. ~y, l...-- J/. "I ~~ 1-7 '/of IV 1 ' Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.3(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, I, Andrew J. Frackman, Esq., a member in good standing of the bar of this Court, hereby moves for an Order allowing the admission pro hac vice of: Richard Parker O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 383-5380 Direct (202) 383-5414 Facsimile rparker@omm.com (r, o .;, '. to appear on behalf of defendant Apple Inc. in this action. In support of this application, annexed hereto is the Declaration of Andrew J. Frackman, Esq., Declaration of Richard Parker, Esq., and Certificates of Good Standing from the District of Columbia and the State of California verifying that Mr. Parker is a member in good standing of the bars of the District of Columbia and California. This motion is also accompanied by payment to the Clerk of this Court of the total fee of two hundred dollars ($200.00). No brief is necessary in support of this motion since it raises no issues of law and the relief sought is wholly within the Court's discretion. A proposed Order is attached. Dated: New York, New York May 1,2012 By:+-____+-~~~----------An ew J. F ckman, Esq. Times Squa Tower 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 326-2000 Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 afrackman@omm.com Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?