Liang v. Lucky Plaza Restaurant Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING R & R for 19 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff Jimming Liang initiated the instant action on June 28,2012. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Gabriel Gorenstein on December 5, 2012. As set out in Magistrate Judge Gorenste in's Report and Recommendation of March 21, 2013, as well as in submissions to the Court by David Lira, Plaintiffs former attorney, Mr. Lira has made several unsuccessful attempts to contact Plaintiff since December, 2012. Plaintiff did not resp ond to any of several messages left by Mr. Lira and has ceased cooperating with Mr. Lira's efforts to prosecute this matter. 1n a February 7, 2013 Order, Magistrate Judge Gorenstein ordered Plaintiff to contact the Court directly, noting that if he did not do so by March 7, 2013, his "case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." (ECF No. 13 (emphasis in original).) Plaintiff failed to comply, and, accordingly, Magistrate Ju dge Gorenstein recommended that the case be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the R&R, nor has Plaintiff contacted the Court in the four months since the R&R was issued. Having reviewed the R&R for clear error, see Wilds v. UPS, 26 2 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 1991), and finding none, it is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed, without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 7/17/2013) (rsh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTIIERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE FILED: July 17,7013
JIMMING LIANG,
Plaintiff,
v.
12 Civ. 5077 (PAC) (GWG)
LUCKY PLAZA RESTAURANT,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING R&R
HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Jimming Liang initiated the instant action on June 28, 2012. The case was
referred to Magistrate Judge Gabriel Gorenstein on December 5,2012. As set out in Magistrate
Judge Gorenstein's Report and Recommendation of March 2I, 20l3, as well as in submissions to
the Court by David Lira, Plaintiffs former attorney, I Mr. Lira has made several unsuccessful
attempts to contact Plaintiff since December, 2012. Plaintiff did not respond to any of several
messages left by Mr. Lira and has ceased cooperating with Mr. Lira's efforts to prosecute this
matter. In a February 7, 2013 Order, Magistrate Judge Gorenstein ordered Plaintiff to contact the
Court directly, noting that ifhe did not do so by March 7, 20l3, his "case may be dismissed for
failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." (ECF No. 13
(emphasis in original).) Plaintiff failed to comply, and, accordingly, Magistrate Judge
Gorenstein recommended that the case be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the
R&R, nor has Plaintiff contacted the Court in the four months since the R&R was issued.
Having reviewed the R&R for clear error, see Wilds v. UPS, 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y.
1991), and finding none, it is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the complaint is
dismissed, without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this
case.
Dated: New York, New York
July 17, 2013
SO~ERED
PAUL~C~
United States District Judge
I
Magistrate Judge Gorenstein granted Lira's motion to withdraw as Plaintiff's attorney on March 21,2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?