D.L.G. et al v. United States et al
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 60 Report and Recommendations. After reviewing the proposed infant's compromise order, the affirmation from the infant's representative accepting the proposed compromise, the aff irmation from the infant's counsel outlining and accepting the terms of the settlement, and the submitted medical reports, the Court finds no clear error in the Report. The Report is therefore adopted in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close item 57 on the docket and to close the case. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/2/2015) (kl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
USDC-SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 11/3/2015
D.L.G., an infant by her mother and natural
guardian MAYERLYN GOMEZ, AND
MAYERLYN GOMEZ, individually,
No. 12-CV-7526 (RA)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT &
RECOMMENDATION
v.
UNITED STATES
Defendant.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:
On October 9, 2012, Plaintiff Mayerlyn Gomez, through her attorneys filed this action on
her own behalf and on behalf of D.L.G., an infant under the age of eighteen years. Gomez filed
an Amended Verified Complaint on February 25, 2013. Compl. 13. The Complaint raises claims
under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2401(b), 2671–80, alleging
negligent medical care and failure to obtain informed consent. Dkt. 13 ¶¶ 12–28. On January 7,
2015, after the parties notified the Court that they had agreed to resolve Plaintiff’s claims for a
certain amount, Plaintiffs filed a proposed infant compromise, which the Court referred to
Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis. Dkt. 59. On June 1, 2015, Judge Ellis issued a Report and
Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that the proposed infant compromise be accepted.
The Court has received no objections to the Report, and for the reasons that follow, adopts the
Report in its entirety.
When reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court “may accept, reject, or
modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objections are made, “a district court need only satisfy itself that
there is no clear error on the face of the record." Carlson v. Dep't of Justice, No. 10-CV-5149
(PAE)(KNF), 2012 WL 928124, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2012) (citation omitted); see also Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b).
In reviewing a proposed settlement involving claims by or on behalf of an infant plaintiff,
the Court evaluates the proposed settlement to determine whether "(1) the best interests of the
infant are protected by the terms and conditions of the proposed settlement; and (2) the proposed
settlement, including any legal fees and expenses to be paid as part of the proposal are fair and
reasonable." Mateo v. United States., No. 06-CV-2647 (KNF), 2008 WL 3166974, at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
Aug. 6, 2008) (citing S.D.N.Y. Loe. Civ. R. 83.2(a)(l), N.Y. Jud. L. § 474, and N.Y. Civ. Prac. L.
and R. §§ 1205-08).
In his Report, Judge Ellis reasonably concluded that (1) the proposed settlement is in the
best interest of the infant plaintiff, D.L.G., and (2) the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable
because (a) it was reached after arm's length negotiations and discovery, (b) Plaintiffs' attorney is
experienced and found the settlement reasonable, and (c) the award is comparable to a likely
litigation award. Report at 5-8. Judge Ellis also reasonably denied Plaintiff Gomez's request to
withdraw $10,000 from the settlement funds to purchase a vehicle. Id. at 9. The purpose of an
infant plaintiff's settlement funds "is not to supplement or substitute for the financial obligations
of the parent to a child," and the Court will permit only expenditure for "an extraordinary purpose."
See Star S. v. Clark, No. 01-CV-687l(DLl)(CLP), 2009 WL 81340 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2009). Here,
Plaintiff D.L.G.'s condition does not require routine doctor's appointments, medication, or other
treatment. Att'y Affirm. at 1O;. The Court agrees that the purchase of a car does not constitute an
"extraordinary purpose" in these circumstances. See Star S., 2009 WL 81340, at * 1.
2
The Court also finds the request of $25,000 in attorney's fees and an additional $26,612.13
for disbursements to be reasonable. Although the Report considered the award of attorney's fees
under New York Judiciary Law§ 474 limit on attorney contingency fees, which caps fees at thirty
percent of the first $250,000 retained in medical malpractice cases, the applicable standard in this
case is the twenty-five percent limit on attorney's fees owed by plaintiffs in FTCA actions against
the United States. Report at 9; see 28 U.S.C. § 2678. Because the proposed attorney's fees do not
exceed twenty-five percent of the total settlement, the requested fee falls within the range of
acceptable compensation.
After reviewing the proposed infant's compromise order, the affirmation from the infant's
representative accepting the proposed compromise, the affirmation from the infant's counsel
outlining and accepting the terms of the settlement, and the submitted medical reports, the Court
finds no clear error in the Report. The Report is therefore adopted in its entirety.
The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close item 57 on the docket and to close
the case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 2, 2015
New York, New York
onnie Abrams -~"-
United States District Judge
3
Case 1:12-cv-07526-RA-RLE Document 57 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 66
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------------X
D.L.G., an Infant by her mother and natural guardian
MA YERLYN GOMEZ, and MAYERLYN GOMEZ,
Individually,
ECF Case 12 Civ. 7526 (RA)
INFANT'S
COMPROMISE
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
-againstTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
--------------------------------------------------------------------X
Upon reading and filing the declaration of MA YERLYN GOMEZ, mother and natural
guardian of the infant plaintiff D.L.G.; the affirmation of James P. Fitzgerald, Esq.; the report of
Joel Redfield, Ph.D.; the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release of Federal Tort
Claims Act Claims Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2677 (the "Stipulation"); and upon all papers filed
and proceedings had herein; and it appearing that D.L.G. was born on :
; and the
said case being settled on November 26, 2014 after the April 1, 2011 effective date of the New
York Medical Indemnity Fund ("The Fund"); and the Court having concluded that the
aforementioned infant has sustained a "birth related neurological injury" as a result of alleged
medical malpractice and is a "qualified plaintiff'' as defined under§§ 2999-(h)(l) and 2999(h)(4) of the Public Health Law; and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that it is in the
best interest of the infant plaintiff, D.L.G., to settle and compromise the cause of action herein
against defendant THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the total settlement pursuant to
Public Health Law§ 2999 of $101,000.00 ($100,000.00 of which is for past and future pain and
suffering, future loss of wages and past medical expenses and any other non-Fund costs, and
1
Case 1:12-cv-07526-RA-RLE Document 57 Filed 01/07/15
Page 2 of 66
$1,000.00 of which is for future "Medicals and Qualifying Heath Care Costs" as defined by
Public Health Law §2999-h(3) to be paid pursuant to Public Health Law §2999(g)-(j);
NOW, on motion of Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, P.C., attorneys for the plaintiff, it is hereby
ORDERED, that MAYERLYN GOMEZ, as mother and natural guardian of D.L.G., be
and she is hereby authorized to enter into a compromise of the personal injury claims ofD.L.G.
against defendant THE UNJTED STATES OF AMERICA upon the within terms; and it is
further
ORDERED, that the cause of action brought on behalf ofD.L.G. against defendant THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA be and the same is hereby settled for the total sum pursuant to
Public Health Law§ 2999 of $101,000.00 upon the tem1s of the Stipulation; and it is further
ORDERED, that per agreement of the parties and approval by this Court, the
$101,000.00 settlement is allocated so that $100,000.00 is allocated to the claims for the infant
plaintiff's damages other than future Qualifying Health Care Costs, including approved
attorney's fee and disbursements and all liens; and $1,000 is allocated to the infant plaintiff's
claims for future Qualifying Health Care Costs; and it is further
ORDERED, that as soon as practical, plaintiffs shall submit an application on behalf of
the infant plaintiff for enrollment in the Fund as established by Title 4 of the Public Health Law
("The Fund"); and it is further
ORDERED, that as set forth in Public Health Law§ 2999-j(6)(a), in the event the
administrator of the Fund determines that the infant plaintiff is a qualified plaintiff as that term is
defined in Title 4 of the Public Health Law,§ 2999-h(4), all plaintiffs future Qualifying Health
Care Costs shall be paid in accordance with Title 4 of the Public Health Law, and it is further
2
Case 1:12-cv-07526-RA-RLE Document 57 Filed 01/07/15 Page 3 of 66
ORDERED, that subsequent to approval of this Infant Compromise Order and the
execution of the Stipulation, the $100,000.00 settlement payment made by defendant THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA shall be distributed as follows:
a)
The sum of $25,000.00 to The Fitzgerald Law Finn, P .C., and as for its
attorney's fees for services rendered on behalf of D.L.G. in this matter;
b)
The sum of $26,612.13 to The Fitzgerald Law Firm, P.C. as and for its
disbursements; and
c)
The sum of $48,387.87 to MAYERL YN GOMEZ, as mother and natural
guardian
of
D.L.G.,
jointly
Apple Bank for savings,
an
with
located
officer
of
at
43-73 Kissena Blvd.
F~T~u~s~h~1~·n~g-++-,~N~Y_1_1~3~5~5~--- to be deposited in a time deposit or
certificate of deposit account as provided hereinafter, for the sole use and
benefit of the infant plaintiff MA YERL YN GOMEZ;
and it is further
ORDERED, that the funds to be deposited in the bank account on behalf of D.L.G. shall
be deposited in the above bank in the name of MA YERL YN GOMEZ, as mother and natural
guardian ofD.L.G., and held for the infant's sole use and benefit in an account paying the
highest rate of interest available subject to the further order of this Court until the infant reaches
the age of eighteen years; and it is further
ORDERED, that the aforesaid time deposit or certificate of deposit account shall be
continuously renewed upon maturity at the highest rate of interest then available, except that the
date of maturity shall not extend beyond the infant's eighteenth birthday, and in the event that no
such time deposit or certificate of deposit account is available, the accumulated funds shall then
3
Case 1:12-cv-07526-RA-RLE Document 57 Filed 01/07/15
Page 4 of 66
be placed in the banks' insured money market account; and it is further
ORDERED, that said bank shall pay out of the infant's account such sums as may from
time to time become due and payable for Federal and New York State income tax, or any other
state or local income tax for which the infant is or may become liable, limited to taxes due from
income earned by the infant's account, including penalties or interest thereon, and any amounts
that may be required for payments of estimated income taxes to the United States or to the State
of New York in such amounts as may be certified to the bank by a qualified tax preparer retained
or employed on behalf of the infant by the infant's mother and natural guardian, MAYERLYN
GOMEZ, or such amounts as may be due and payable for that po1iion of the infant's personal
income tax liability attributable to income earned by her account, including interest and penalties
thereon, as shown on any official bill therefore issued by the United States or the State of New
York or other income tax authority; and it is further
ORDERED, that said bank be and is hereby authorized without further order of this Court
to pay out of the infant's bank account, reasonable fees for the preparation of any income tax,
estimated income tax returns or accountings that may be required to be filed by or on the infant's
behalf regarding the tax due for the income earned from the infant's account; and it is further
ORDERED, that said bank issue a check from D.L.G.'s account in the amount of
$10,000.00 to MAYERLYN GOMEZ for the purchase of a vehicle for D.L.G.'s benefit; and it is
further
ORDERED, that there shall be no right of withdrawal from the aforesaid bank account,
including any insured money market account, until the infant's eighteenth birthday, except upon
further order of this Court, which shall be certified by the Clerk of the Court; and it is further
4
Case 1:12-cv-07526-RA-RLE Document 57 Filed 01/07/15
Page 5 of 66
ORDERED, that said bank shall upon D.L.G.'s demand thereof and without further Court
Order, pay over to D.L.G. when she reaches the age of eighteen on;
. . __ -. all monies
held for her benefit in her account upon presentation of proper proof thereof to said bank; and it
is further
ORDERED, that in the event that the infant shall die before reaching the age of eighteen,
the balance of the monies held in her account shall be paid to her estate; and it is further
ORDERED, that the plaintiff shall hold defendant THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA and/or its insurer(s) hannless from any and all liens; and it is further
ORDERED, that conditioned upon compliance with the terms of this Order,
MA YERLYN GOMEZ is hereby authorized and empowered to execute and deliver a General
Release in favor of defendant THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the Stipulation, and any
other instrument -necessary to effect said settlement; and it is further
ORDERED, that the filing of a bond is hereby waived.
;us.DJ.
'If z,/1S
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?