Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons outlined above, plaintiffs' limited objections to the R & R are granted. The parties have not filed objections to the remainder of the R & R. Having reviewed the portions of the R & R to which no objection was made, the Court finds no clear error in these portions. Accordingly, the Court adopts in part and modifies the Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part. With the exception of the eleven plaintiffs that objected to the R & R, the unresponsive plaintiffs' FLSA claims are dismissed with prejudice. The withdrawing plaintiffs' motion is granted. Their FLSA Claims are dismissed without prejudice and tolled for 60 days following dismissal. All of these plaintiffs' rights to participate in the Rule 23 state law class actions are preserved. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 2/1/2016) (kgo)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?