Merhej et al v. I.C.S. International Custody System Inc. et al
Filing
35
ORDER: Adopting 34 Report and Recommendation. In any event, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation are well reasoned and correct. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against Defendant I.C.S. International Custody System Inc. in the amount of $256,859.95. Post judgment interest will accrue from the date of the judgment. The clerk is also directed to close this case and to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/10/2014) (ama)
USfilCSDNV
DOCUMENT
£lECTRON~CALLY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
,BOC#
DATE FILeD:
FILED
1
JIll Jg
FERNANDO HIRSCH MERHEJ, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
13 Civ.
- against -
869 (JGK)
ORDER
I.C.S. INTERNATIONAL CUSTODY SYSTEM
INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Maas, dated January 9, 2014, following an
inquest on damages after this Court indicated that the
plaintiffs were entitled to a default judgment against Defendant
I.C.S. International Custody System Inc.
No objections have
been filed to the Report and Recommendation and the time for
filing such objections has passed.
In any event, the Court
finds that the Report and Recommendation are well reasoned and
correct.
The Court therefore adopts the Report and
Recommendation.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the
plaintiffs and against Defendant I.C.S. International Custody
System Inc. in the amount of $256,859.95.
Post judgment
interest will accrue from the date of the judgment.
The clerk is also directed to close this case and to close
all pending motions.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
New York, New York
March 10, 2014
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?