Merhej et al v. I.C.S. International Custody System Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER: Adopting 34 Report and Recommendation. In any event, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation are well reasoned and correct. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against Defendant I.C.S. International Custody System Inc. in the amount of $256,859.95. Post judgment interest will accrue from the date of the judgment. The clerk is also directed to close this case and to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/10/2014) (ama)

Download PDF
USfilCSDNV DOCUMENT £lECTRON~CALLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ,BOC# DATE FILeD: FILED 1 JIll Jg FERNANDO HIRSCH MERHEJ, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 13 Civ. - against - 869 (JGK) ORDER I.C.S. INTERNATIONAL CUSTODY SYSTEM INC., ET AL., Defendants. JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Maas, dated January 9, 2014, following an inquest on damages after this Court indicated that the plaintiffs were entitled to a default judgment against Defendant I.C.S. International Custody System Inc. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has passed. In any event, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation are well reasoned and correct. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against Defendant I.C.S. International Custody System Inc. in the amount of $256,859.95. Post judgment interest will accrue from the date of the judgment. The clerk is also directed to close this case and to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York March 10, 2014 United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?