Tarazi et al v. Truehope Inc. et al
Filing 122
ORDER RULING ON MOTION OF THE STRINGAMS AND OPEN MIND TO DISMISS re: 75 Motion to Dismiss filed by Autumn Stringam, Dana Ray Stringam, Open Mind Consulting, Inc. Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV has recommended that the motion of the String ams and Open Mind [DI 75] be granted in part and denied in part. Substantially for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation, the motion is granted to the extent that (1) the breach of contract claim in Claim 1 premised on the assignment agreement, (2) the claim for an accounting (Claim 7) as asserted against Mr. Stringam, and (3) the spoliation claim (Claim 9) are dismissed. The motion is denied in all other respects. The movants' objections to the report and recommendation are overruled. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 12/6/2016) (cla)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
