Balance Point Divorce Funding, LLC v. Scrantom et al

Filing 45

CORRECTION TO MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF OCTOBER 21, 2013 re: 44 Letter filed by Balance Point Divorce Funding, LLC. The second paragraph on page 2 of the Order of October 21, 2013, starting with "For the reasons stated above" is deleted, a nd, in its place, the following paragraph is inserted: For the reasons stated below, defendants' motions to dismiss are granted with respect to the tortious interference with business relations claim and denied with respect to all other claims. Mr. Scrantom's motion to dismiss under principles of abstention is denied, and his motion to transfer venue is denied without prejudice. The last paragraph beginning on page 21 of the Order starting with "For the reasons stated above" is deleted and, in its place, the following paragraph is inserted: For the reasons stated above, defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED with respect to the tortious interference with business relations claim and DENIED with respect to all other claims. Mr. Scrantom's motion to dismiss under principles of abstention is DENIED, and his motion to transfer venue is DENIED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/30/2013) (ja)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------x
BALANCE POINT DIVORCE Fl}NDING,
LLC,
Plaintiff,
-against-

USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#: _____________
DATE FILED:

LD - 3/ -

I?:>

13 Civ. 1049 (PKC)
CORRECTION TO MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER OF OCTOBER 21,2013

TIMOTHY D. SCRANTOM, JURIDICA
CAPIT AL MANAGEMENT LIMITED,
JURIDICA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (US)
INC., and JURIDIC A INVESTMENTS
lIMITED,
Defendant.

-----------------------------------------------------------x
P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge
The second paragraph on page 2 of the Order of October 21,2013, starting with
"For the reasons stated above" is deleted, and, in its place, the following is inserted:
For the reasons stated below, defendants' motions to
dismiss are granted with respect to the tortious interference
with business relations claim and denied with respect to an
other claims. Mr. Scrantom's motion to dismiss under
principles of abstention is denied, and his motion to transfer
venue is denied without prejudice.
The last paragraph beginning on page 21 of the Order starting with "For the
reasons stated above" is deleted and, in its place, the following is inserted:
For the reasons stated above, defendants' motions to
dismiss are GRANTED with respect to the tortious
interference with business relations claim and DENIED
with respect to all other claims. Mr. Scrantom's motion to
dismiss under principles of abstention is DENIED, and his
motion to transfer venue is DENIED without prejudice.

~~
castel

SO ORDERED.

P.KeVill

United States District Judge

Dated: New York, New York
October 30, 2013

-2­