Perry et al v. Estates of Donald Byrd et al
OPINION AND ORDER: The Defendants in each of these actions have moved to dismiss on the grounds of, inter alia, res judicata and/or collateral estoppel and a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has countered with "motions for judgment against the Defendants." The Court has consolidated the cases for the purposes of resolving these motions. For the reasons stated below, the Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. For the reasons outlined above, the Defendants' m otions to dismiss are GRANTED without leave to amend. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close each of the files and to terminate all pending matters. This Court also certifies that any appeal by Plaintiff from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies in forma pauperis status for the purpose of any such appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/03/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?