CBF Industria De Gusa S/A et al v. Amci Holdings,Inc., et al

Filing 609

ORDER: vacating 608 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. September 16, 2022 oral argument is VACATED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/07/2022) (ama)

Case 1:13-cv-02581-PKC-JLC Document 609
608 Filed 09/07/22
09/06/22 Page 1 of 2

BOSTON

CONNECTICUT

FLORIDA

NEW JERSEY

NEW YORK

PROVIDENCE

September 16, 2022 oral argument is VACATED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: 9/7/2022

WASHINGTON, DC

ELIZABETH J. SHER
Attorney at Law
One Jefferson Road
Parsippany, NJ 07054-2891
T: [phone] F: [phone]
[e-mail]

September 6, 2022
VIA ECF
The Honorable P. Kevin Castel
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:

CBF Industria De Gusa, S/A, et al., v. AMCI Holdings, Inc., et al.,
Case No. 13 -cv-2581 (PKC) (JLC)

Dear Judge Castel:
Pursuant to Rule 1(B) of Your Honor’s Individual Practices, we write jointly with
counsel for the Defendants to request a brief adjournment of the September 16, 2022 date set for
oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (see ECF # 607) to early
October 2022. This is the only currently scheduled conference or hearing before the Court, and
no prior adjournments of this date have been requested.
The reason for the requested adjournment is that counsel for the parties who will be
arguing the motion have previously scheduled obligations on September 16, 2022. Plaintiffs’
counsel has a long-planned family vacation in Montreal, Canada scheduled for September 14-18.
Defendants’ counsel has a one-week arbitration starting the next business day on September 19,
2022, has witness preparation sessions scheduled for September 14 and 15, and anticipates
scheduling further witness preparation on September 16, 2022.
Counsel for the parties are available for oral argument on October 3, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 17,
and 18, 2022, and respectfully request an adjournment to one of those dates. The parties do not
anticipate that this adjournment will impact any deadlines in the scheduling order, all of which
are contingent on this Court’s ruling on the summary judgment motions.

Case 1:13-cv-02581-PKC-JLC Document 609
608 Filed 09/07/22
09/06/22 Page 2 of 2

The Honorable Kevin P. Castel
September 6, 2022
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
DAY PITNEY LLP

MANDEL BHANDARI LLP

By: /s/ Elizabeth J. Sher
Elizabeth Sher
One Jefferson Street
Parsippany, NJ 07054-2891
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Robert Glunt
Robert Glunt
80 Pine Street, 33rd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
Counsel for Defendants