M.G. et al v. New York City Department of Education et al

Filing 288

ORDER: Accordingly: 1. Plaintiffs' letter motion to file their proposed Fifth Amended Complaint (Exhibit A to Dkt. 281) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows. Where the Court indicates that a particular subject matter may be amended, the grant is not as to the subject matter generally but rather with respect to the specific allegations made in the proposed Fifth Amended Complaint as submitted to the parties and the Court (i.e., Exhibit A to Dkt. 281). 2. Conform Definition of Au tism Services to Certification Decision: Granted. 3. Updated Autism Statistics: Granted, so long as the statistics are consistent with the rulings herein as to which subject matter may or may not be included in the Fifth Amended Complaint, as further set forth in this Order. 8. By March 18, 2020, Plaintiffs shall provide Defendants with a revised proposed Fifth Amended Complaint that complies with this order; the parties shall then meet and confer to seek agreement on the revision; and by March 26, 2020 either (a) Plaintiffs shall file the revised proposed Fifth Amended Complaint, or (b) the parties shall file a joint letter addressing any remaining disputes. SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 3/26/2020.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 3/12/2020) (mml)