M.G. et al v. New York City Department of Education et al

Filing 467

ORDER terminating 457 Letter Motion to Compel; terminating 458 Letter Motion to Compel; terminating 459 Letter Motion for Discovery; terminating 460 Letter Motion for Conference. As discussed at the discovery conference held via Teams o n September 24, 2024, the parties' dispute regarding the scope of Plaintiff's 30(b)(6) deposition topics directed to the State and City Defendants is resolved as follows (with reference to Plaintiffs revised notices): New York State The fo llowing topics are allowed: 1 (limited to district, borough, or city level), 2, 3 (limited to the referenced meeting), 4 (limited to the reference meeting), 5 (subject to Plaintiff specifying what in the document is to be addressed), 6, 7, 8 (limit ed to types and sources of funding), 9 (limited to material actually considered), 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (limited to material actually considered), 18, 19, 21, 22. New York City The following topics are allowed: 1, 2 (limited to policies, pr ocedures, practices), 3-13, 14 (reframed as extent to which UFT workday rules pose constraints on ability to offer the specified services), 15-22, 23 (limited to policies, procedures, practices and extent of training provided if any), 24 (limited to specific meeting and any subsequent change to policy or practice denoted in the document referencing the meeting), 25-32, 34 (subject to Plaintiff clarifying particular issues of interest in document NYC DOE 15505-12). The parties shall meet and confer regarding dates for the depositions. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the letter motions at Dkts. 457, 458, 459, and 460. SO ORDERED. Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 9/24/2024) (tg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X M.G. ET AL., : : Plaintiffs, : : - against : : NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF : EDUCATION ET AL., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------X 09/24/2024 13-CV-4639 (SHS) (RWL) ORDER ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge. As discussed at the discovery conference held via Teams on September 24, 2024, the parties’ dispute regarding the scope of Plaintiff’s 30(b)(6) deposition topics directed to the State and City Defendants is resolved as follows (with reference to Plaintiff’s revised notices): New York State The following topics are allowed: 1 (limited to district, borough, or city level), 2, 3 (limited to the referenced meeting), 4 (limited to the reference meeting), 5 (subject to Plaintiff specifying what in the document is to be addressed), 6, 7, 8 (limited to types and sources of funding), 9 (limited to material actually considered), 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (limited to material actually considered), 18, 19, 21, 22. New York City The following topics are allowed: 1, 2 (limited to policies, procedures, practices), 3-13, 14 (reframed as extent to which UFT workday rules pose constraints on ability to offer the specified services), 15-22, 23 (limited to policies, procedures, practices and 1 extent of training provided if any), 24 (limited to specific meeting and any subsequent change to policy or practice denoted in the document referencing the meeting), 25-32, 34 (subject to Plaintiff clarifying particular issues of interest in document NYC DOE 1550512). The parties shall meet and confer regarding dates for the depositions. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the letter motions at Dkts. 457, 458, 459, and 460. SO ORDERED. _________________________________ ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: September 24, 2024 New York, New York Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?