Azkour v. Bowery Residents Committee, Inc. et al
Filing 73
OPINION #106536 re: 71 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Seeking Plaintiff's Consent to Such Relief addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Paul Kovner dated June 20, 2016, filed by Tereen Llewelyn -Miller, Kevin Martin, Lawrence, Bowery Residents Committee, Inc., Angela Kedzior, Janet Forte; re: 68 LETTER MOTION to Compel Bowery Residents Committee, Inc., Lawrence Rosenblatt, aka Muzzy Rosenblatt, Janet Forte, Kevin Martin, Tere en Llewelyn-Miller, Angela Kedzior to Bowery Residents Committee, Inc., Lawrence Rosenblatt, aka Muzzy Rosenblatt, J, filed by Hicham Azkour. Defense counsel has sought an additional thirty days with which to respond to pro se plaintiff Hich am Azkour's letter motion to compel, which in part requests that defendants ascertain the identities of, and turn over information relating to the John Doe and Jane Doe defendants in this case. ECF Nos. 68, 71. Azkour has consented to defendants ' request. ECF No. 70. Defendants therefore have until July 21, 2016 to respond to Azkour's letter motion to compel. In addition, on May 9, 2016, this court granted Azkour leave to amend his complaint as to his claims under 42 U.S.C. 167; 1981 and the Fair Housing Act. ECF No. 67. Plaintiff has not amended his complaint to date, and the court notes that it is not necessary to ascertain the names and addresses of John Does 1-5 and Jane Does 1-5 before doing so. Accordingly, Az kour is directed to file his amended complaint within thirty days of this order, no later than July 21, 2016. In the event that defendants are ultimately able to assist Azkour in identifying the unnamed defendants in the complaint, plaintiff may request leave of the court to further amend his complaint to identify the John and Jane Doe defendants with their proper names. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 6/21/2016) (kl) Modified on 6/22/2016 (ca).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.