Osby v. The New York City Dept. of Probation
Filing 51
OPINION re: 39 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by City of New York. In sum, plaintiff's allegations of adverse employment actions fail to state claims for descrimination or retaliation under the ADA for one of the following reasons: (1) they are time-barred; (2) they are not, in fact, adverse employment actions; or (3) they fail to plausibly allege a nexus between the adverse action and discriminatory or retaliatory animus. Further, plaintiff's motion to amend is denied as futile. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 9/22/2017) (mro)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
