Maher v. Bank of Nova Scotia et al

Filing 121

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Fairness Hearing is adjourned to Thursday, October 21, 2021 at 10:00 A.M. The Fairness Hearing will be held in Courtroom 443 of the Thurgood Marshall United S tates Courthouse, located at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than Wednesday, September 29, 2021, Plaintiffs must post the change in date and time of the Fairness Hearing on the settlement website. See Order, Dkt. 516 28. By no later than Friday, October 1, 2021, Plaintiffs must inform the Court that the settlement website has been updated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that per the SDNY COVID-19 COURTHOUSE ENTRY PROGRAM, any person who appears at any SDNY courthouse must complete a questionnaire and have his or her temperature taken. Please see the enclosed instructions. Completing the questionnaire ahead of time will save time and effort upon entry. Only those individuals who meet t he entry requirements established by the questionnaire will be permitted entry. Please contact chambers promptly if you or your client do not meet the requirements. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any person who appears at any SDNY courthouse must co mply with Standing Order M10-468 (21-MC-164), which further pertains to courthouse entry. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that interested members of the public may listen to the hearing remotely by dialing 1-888-363-4749, using the access code 3121171 and t he security code 2548. All of those accessing the hearing are reminded that recording or rebroadcasting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. SO ORDERED. (Fairness Hearing set for 10/21/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni.) (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 9/21/2021) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-md-02548-VEC et al. (tg) Modified on 9/21/2021 (tg).

Download PDF
Case 1:14-cv-01459-VEC Document 121 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1SDNY USDC of 3 DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 09/21/2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ X IN RE: : : 14-MD-2548 (VEC) COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC., GOLD : 14-MC-2548 (VEC) FUTURES AND OPTIONS TRADING : LITIGATION : ORDER : This Document Relates to All Actions : ------------------------------------------------------------ X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS on December 9, 2016, the Court preliminarily approved a settlement with Deutsche Bank, Order, Dkt. 187; WHEREAS on February 12, 2021, the Court preliminarily approved a settlement with HSBC Bank, Order, Dkt. 515; and WHEREAS a hearing to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Deutsche Bank and HSBC settlements (the “Fairness Hearing”) is currently scheduled for Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 10:00 A.M., Order, Dkt. 580; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that due to a conflict in the Court’s calendar,1 the Fairness Hearing is adjourned to Thursday, October 21, 2021 at 10:00 A.M. The Fairness Hearing will be held in Courtroom 443 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, located at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than Wednesday, September 29, 2021, Plaintiffs must post the change in date and time of the Fairness Hearing on the settlement 1 As the parties know, criminal cases have priority over civil cases; as the parties may also know, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Southern District of New York is using a centralized calendaring system to schedule jury trials. The Court now has a criminal trial that conflicts with the scheduled Fairness Hearing in this matter. The Court appreciates the parties, the objectors, and the public’s understanding. Case 1:14-cv-01459-VEC Document 121 Filed 09/21/21 Page 2 of 3 website. See Order, Dkt. 516 ¶ 28. By no later than Friday, October 1, 2021, Plaintiffs must inform the Court that the settlement website has been updated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that per the SDNY COVID-19 COURTHOUSE ENTRY PROGRAM, any person who appears at any SDNY courthouse must complete a questionnaire and have his or her temperature taken. Please see the enclosed instructions. Completing the questionnaire ahead of time will save time and effort upon entry. Only those individuals who meet the entry requirements established by the questionnaire will be permitted entry. Please contact chambers promptly if you or your client do not meet the requirements. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any person who appears at any SDNY courthouse must comply with Standing Order M10-468 (21-MC-164), which further pertains to courthouse entry. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that interested members of the public may listen to the hearing remotely by dialing 1-888-363-4749, using the access code 3121171 and the security code 2548. All of those accessing the hearing are reminded that recording or rebroadcasting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. SO ORDERED. _________________________________ VALERIE CAPRONI United States District Judge Date: September 21, 2021 New York, NY 2 Case 1:14-cv-01459-VEC Document 121 Filed 09/21/21 Page 3 of 3 Instructions for Courthouse Entry All members of the public, including attorneys, appearing at a Southern District of New York courthouse must complete a questionnaire and have their temperature taken before being allowed entry into that courthouse. On the day you are due to arrive at the courthouse, click on the following weblink to begin the enrollment process. Follow the instructions and fill out the questionnaire. If your answers meet the requirements for entry, you will be sent a QR code to be used at the SDNY entry device at the courthouse entrance. Weblink: https://app.certify.me/SDNYPublic Note: If you do not have a mobile phone or mobile phone number, you must complete the questionnaire and temperature screening at an entry device at the courthouse. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?