LaCouture et al v. National Hockey League
Filing
12
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE. The motion of STUART A. DAVIDSON, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/1/2014) (lmb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X
DAN LaCOUTURE, DAN KECZMER, JACK :
CARLSON, RICHARD BRENNAN, BRAD
MAXWELL, MICHAEL PELUSO, TOM
YOUNGHANS, ALLAN ROURKE, and
SCOTT BAILEY, Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated,
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-02531 (SAS)
ORDER FOR ADMISSION
PRO lIAC VICE
Plaintiffs,
vs.
NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE,
Defendant.
The motion of STUART A. DAVIDSON, for admission to practice Pro Hae Vice in the
above-captioned action is granted.
Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the bar of
th~
state of
Florida; and that his contact information is as follows:
Stuart A. Davidson
Robbins GelJer Rudman & Dowd LLP
120 E. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500
Boca Raton, FL 33432
Telephone: 5611750-3000
5611750-3364 (fax)
E-mail: sdavidson@rgrdlaw.com
Applicant having requested admission Pro Hae Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for the
plaintiffs in the above-entitled action;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hae Vfce in the
above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including
the Rules gover ing discipline of attorneys.
Dated:
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?