LaCouture et al v. National Hockey League

Filing 12

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE. The motion of STUART A. DAVIDSON, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/1/2014) (lmb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X DAN LaCOUTURE, DAN KECZMER, JACK : CARLSON, RICHARD BRENNAN, BRAD MAXWELL, MICHAEL PELUSO, TOM YOUNGHANS, ALLAN ROURKE, and SCOTT BAILEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-02531 (SAS) ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO lIAC VICE Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, Defendant. The motion of STUART A. DAVIDSON, for admission to practice Pro Hae Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the bar of th~ state of Florida; and that his contact information is as follows: Stuart A. Davidson Robbins GelJer Rudman & Dowd LLP 120 E. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Telephone: 5611750-3000 5611750-3364 (fax) E-mail: sdavidson@rgrdlaw.com Applicant having requested admission Pro Hae Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hae Vfce in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules gover ing discipline of attorneys. Dated: -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?