The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Justice

Filing 66

ORDER: The parties are directed to file a joint letter on or before February 20, 2020, updating the Court on the status of this action and stating their positions on what further proceedings are necessary to effectuate the necessary disclosures. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/6/2020) (js)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, 14-CV-3777 (JPO) -v- ORDER THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiffs the New York Times Company and Charlie Savage filed this action against Defendant the United States Department of Justice under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking the release of certain memoranda related to the Department’s investigation into whether certain overseas interrogations by the Central Intelligence Agency and the deaths of detainees in custody violated federal law. On September 30, 2015, this Court filed an Opinion and Order that, among other things, granted partial summary judgment to Plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 33.) The Court subsequently ordered release of certain challenged documents. (Dkt. No. 55.) On September 27, 2019, the Second Circuit reversed in relevant part and remanded to effectuate more limited disclosure of certain portions of the memoranda and exhibits. (Dkt. No. 64.) The Second Circuit’s mandate has now issued. (Dkt. No. 65.) The parties are directed to file a joint letter on or before February 20, 2020, updating the Court on the status of this action and stating their positions on what further proceedings are necessary to effectuate the necessary disclosures. SO ORDERED. 1 Dated: February 6, 2020 New York, New York ____________________________________ J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?