Rivero v. INTL FCStone Inc.,
Filing
25
OPINION & ORDER re: 16 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss filed by INTL FCStone Inc. For the foregoing reasons, INTL's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. INTL's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 3/20/2015) (ajs)
..-----
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
"'
-
1
-l/
f/DOCUMENT
ijEt.ECTRONICALLY FILED I
fusnc-sDNY
------------------------------------------------------------)(
•l
MARIO RIVERO)
I
~IDOC#:
!,
- -- ------- - I
_
~ !_D,::!.~ FILED:_ J~:§9_:~.:J~
.... .......
Plaintiff,
.............
--- ---~--. --.-
-againstINTL FCStone, Inc.,
14 Civ. 3879 (PAC)
Defendant.
OPINION & ORDER
------------------------------------------------------------)(
HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY) United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Mario Rivero sued Defendant INTL FCStone, Inc. ("INTL") for breach of
contract, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and promissory estoppel, arising out ofiNTL's
alleged failure to compensate Plaintiff for his services in helping INTL obtain Mercon Coffee
Corporation ("Mercon"), as a client for INTL' s financial services. Plaintiff also seeks a
declaration that he is entitled to future compensation. INTL moves to dismiss the Complaint,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6)) for failure to state a claim. For the reasons set forth bc:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?